Ex-Premie.Org

Forum III Archive # 48

From: May 21, 1999

To: May 30, 1999

Page: 3 Of: 5



Zac -:- Catweasel is an X premie -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 18:52:47 (EDT)
__Mary M -:- Catweasel is an -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 19:49:43 (EDT)
____Robyn -:- Catweasel is an -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 20:52:06 (EDT)
____catweasel -:- Catweasel is an -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 04:45:27 (EDT)
______Mary M -:- Catweasel is an -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 07:39:47 (EDT)
__Sky King '.out of the blu -:- 'Idiotic Moron??' -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 19:50:39 (EDT)
__Catweasel -:- Zac's an IMBECILE!!!!!!! -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 04:36:34 (EDT)
____Jim -:- Yes, he is -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 11:43:10 (EDT)
____Zac -:- That's it??? X-Cat -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 14:17:56 (EDT)
______Gail -:- Catweasel, think for a minute -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 16:35:10 (EDT)
________Catweasel -:- Here's the Mail ,Gail! -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 10:31:37 (EDT)
______Catweasel -:- That's it??? X-Cat -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 10:17:29 (EDT)

Marianne -:- Soul Rush book -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 18:32:43 (EDT)
__Helen -:- Soul Rush book -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 20:14:51 (EDT)
____Gail -:- Please explain Honeymoon -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 20:40:39 (EDT)
______Marianne -:- Please explain Honeymoon -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 21:52:47 (EDT)
________Liz -:- Please explain Honeymoon -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 23:10:18 (EDT)
__________Mary M -:- Please explain Honeymoon -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 07:38:57 (EDT)
__Mary M -:- Entity Relationship Diagram -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 17:00:29 (EDT)

Jerry -:- Cool Website -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 11:18:04 (EDT)

Depressed -:- Devil and Dan'l Rawat -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:32:00 (EDT)
__Catweasel -:- Devil and Dan'l Rawat -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:42:56 (EDT)
__Victoria -:- Devil and Dan'l Rawat -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:13:14 (EDT)
____Depressed -:- Devil and Dan'l Rawat -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:27:30 (EDT)
______Helen -:- Devil and Dan'l Rawat -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:41:17 (EDT)
________Jerry -:- Devil and Dan'l Rawat -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 14:52:12 (EDT)
__________Helen -:- Devil and Dan'l Rawat -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 20:03:52 (EDT)
____________Jerry -:- Devil and Dan'l Rawat -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 09:10:59 (EDT)
______________Helen -:- Power -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 16:48:13 (EDT)
______Victoria -:- Devil and Dan'l Rawat -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:45:10 (EDT)
____Milton -:- If this is hell... -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 11:44:48 (EDT)
______Victoria -:- To Milton -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 23:00:46 (EDT)
________Roger E. Drek -:- I was just being sneaky (nt) -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 01:53:46 (EDT)
__JW -:- Devil and Dan'l Rawat -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 12:49:10 (EDT)
____Marshall -:- Devil and Dan'l Rawat -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 14:53:12 (EDT)
__Selene -:- Devil and Dan'l Rawat -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 18:17:55 (EDT)
____Happy -:- Devil and Dan'l Rawat -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 16:22:14 (EDT)

Gail -:- Let's start a Cult of our own -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 00:06:02 (EDT)
__Stating the Obvious -:- Let's start a Cult of our own -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 00:43:05 (EDT)
____Runamok -:- Expunging the Oblivious -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 01:02:59 (EDT)
______Disillusioned -:- Expunging the Oblivious -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 03:50:23 (EDT)
________Catweasel -:- Expelling the Obvious -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:05:51 (EDT)
________Magnificent Martian -:- Missing the Obvious -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:43:43 (EDT)
____Victoria -:- Let's start a Cult of our own -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:16:45 (EDT)
______Usually Censored -:- No Black and White Here -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 15:15:11 (EDT)
________Mike -:- Not censored here! -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 15:50:44 (EDT)
__________UC -:- Let's discuss doubt -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 18:15:44 (EDT)
____________Mike -:- Let's discuss doubt -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 19:40:13 (EDT)
________Victoria -:- No Black and White Here -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 23:40:53 (EDT)
__________UC -:- No Black and White Here -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 19:32:51 (EDT)
______Gail -:- Let's start a Cult of our own -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 21:22:26 (EDT)
________Victoria -:- To Gail -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 00:14:18 (EDT)
______Catweasel -:- You've Got One!!Enjoy -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 04:58:17 (EDT)
________Victoria -:- You've Got One!!Enjoy -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 10:37:43 (EDT)
__________Mike -:- That's a fact..... -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 14:41:02 (EDT)
__________Helen -:- You've Got One!!Enjoy -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 22:33:08 (EDT)
____________Catweasel -:- You've Got One!!Enjoy -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 10:45:56 (EDT)
______________Helen -:- Whatever (nt) -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 12:34:49 (EDT)
__________Catweasel -:- You've Got One!!Enjoy -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 10:39:41 (EDT)
____________Magnificent Martian -:- You've Got None -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 12:44:44 (EDT)
______________Catweasel -:- Insignificant Martian! -:- Fri, May 28, 1999 at 06:28:04 (EDT)
____________Victoria -:- You've Got One!!Enjoy -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 15:23:20 (EDT)
______________Catweasel -:- You've Got One!!Enjoy -:- Fri, May 28, 1999 at 06:33:35 (EDT)
________Magnificent Martian -:- You've Got One!!Enjoy -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 01:15:35 (EDT)
__Catweasel -:- Let's start a Cult of our own -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 03:19:29 (EDT)
____nigel -:- You're so full of crap... -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 04:54:37 (EDT)
______cp -:- You're so full of crap... -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 07:24:15 (EDT)
________Catweasel -:- You're so full of crap... -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:07:44 (EDT)
______Catweasel -:- You're so full of yourself... -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 08:59:41 (EDT)
________Jerry -:- You're so full of yourself... -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:21:56 (EDT)
__________Catweasel -:- You're so full of yourself... -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:35:27 (EDT)
____________Jerry -:- You're so full of yourself... -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:41:20 (EDT)
____________Victoria -:- You're so full of yourself... -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:21:31 (EDT)
____________What it is -:- Cat is making our case -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 11:59:41 (EDT)
__________Jethro -:- to Jerry : not be read by CW -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:47:22 (EDT)
____________Catweasel -:- No not RED -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 05:06:25 (EDT)
______________Jethro -:- No not RED -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 14:02:19 (EDT)
________TD -:- Do you sniff glue Catty, or... -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 22:21:00 (EDT)
__________Catweasel -:- You Wish...More Propaganda -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 05:28:54 (EDT)
____________TD -:- You're no premie Catty! -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 07:28:18 (EDT)
______________Catweasel -:- You're a soft rooster -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 07:51:19 (EDT)
________________Sister Mary Mae Hem -:- You're a soft rooster -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 12:55:19 (EDT)
__Robyn -:- Let's start a Cult of our own -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 07:45:27 (EDT)
____The Goddess -:- Let's start a Cult of our own -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 08:14:28 (EDT)
______Helen -:- Robynitarianism -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:14:27 (EDT)
________Robyn -:- Robynitarianism -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:28:17 (EDT)
__________Gail -:- Robyn'UsBlind would be a -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 17:30:27 (EDT)
____________Robyn -:- Robyn'UsBlind would be a -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 18:19:19 (EDT)
______________Gail -:- Robyn'UsBlind = RUB + Rubbies -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 17:24:13 (EDT)
________________Robyn -:- Robyn'UsBlind = RUB + Rubbies -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 22:27:58 (EDT)
______Gail -:- Ya gotta love it! -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 15:50:46 (EDT)
________cp -:- Ya gotta love it! -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 18:27:57 (EDT)
__________Victoria -:- good point! (nt) -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 00:27:57 (EDT)
__Mike -:- Some cultic ideas -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 17:44:35 (EDT)
____Mike -:- I FORGOT ONE THING! -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 17:47:59 (EDT)
______Robyn -:- I FORGOT ONE THING! -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 22:32:59 (EDT)
________Mike -:- I FORGOT ONE THING! -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 11:32:39 (EDT)
__________Robyn -:- I FORGOT ONE THING! -:- Fri, May 28, 1999 at 07:31:54 (EDT)

YOUR GOOROO -:- My own words! -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 16:21:31 (EDT)
__dv -:- Echostar -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 20:19:09 (EDT)
____Gail -:- Echostar -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 15:53:42 (EDT)

KB -:- A friend in need. -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 01:36:26 (EDT)
__Robyn -:- I Wish and Rob -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 07:26:20 (EDT)
____Rob -:- I Wish and Rob -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 18:03:52 (EDT)
______Robyn -:- I Wish and Rob -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 18:55:39 (EDT)
__Katie -:- To 'I Wish' -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 14:40:45 (EDT)
____Victoria -:- To 'I Wish' -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:40:29 (EDT)

Angry -:- help -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 17:50:33 (EDT)
__Jim -:- help -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 17:57:13 (EDT)
____Gail -:- help -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 18:12:39 (EDT)
______Happy -:- help -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 18:32:22 (EDT)
__Rob -:- help -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 18:43:10 (EDT)
____Jim -:- help -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 18:48:25 (EDT)
______Rob -:- Bhodacious bhuddies -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 18:59:16 (EDT)
__Diz -:- help -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 19:45:50 (EDT)
____Cheer up -:- RT's Song-to make you laugh -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 20:17:59 (EDT)
______Rob -:- RT's Song-to make you laugh -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 20:31:07 (EDT)
________The Comedian -:- RT writes Adam Sandler's next -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 20:43:34 (EDT)
__________Rob -:- RT writes Adam Sandler's next -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 20:51:10 (EDT)
____________RT -:- RT writes movies? -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 22:35:00 (EDT)
______________Gail -:- RT writes movies? -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 22:42:23 (EDT)
________________Rob -:- RT writes movies? -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 22:46:33 (EDT)
__________________Still angry -:- RT writes movies? -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 01:22:10 (EDT)
______________Roger E. Drek -:- soon to be ***Best*** (nt) -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 01:42:11 (EDT)
______Zac -:- Made my day, Thanks nt -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 16:11:11 (EDT)
______Diz -:- RT's Song-to make you laugh -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 20:38:08 (EDT)
______Marianne -:- RT's Song-to make you laugh -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 14:50:09 (EDT)

Jim -:- my ethics (way OT, sorry) -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 17:50:24 (EDT)
__GI -:- my ethics (way OT, sorry) -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 22:56:53 (EDT)
__GI -:- my ethics (way OT, sorry) -:- Sun, May 23, 1999 at 23:15:22 (EDT)
____KB -:- US Indian facts-not fantasy -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 00:23:55 (EDT)
____Jim -:- Ha ha, you lose -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 02:41:49 (EDT)
______GI -:- Nothing lost but your soul -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 08:26:31 (EDT)
________Mike -:- So are you saying -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 10:27:02 (EDT)
__________GI -:- So are you saying -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 10:46:03 (EDT)
____________Mike -:- It is EXCLUSIVE -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 11:10:38 (EDT)
______________Jim -:- You're lying, GI -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 15:59:55 (EDT)
____________nigel -:- So are you saying -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 05:12:07 (EDT)
______________GI -:- So are you saying -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 08:07:03 (EDT)
________________Once Guilty and Setup -:- Shiny happy people -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 11:29:50 (EDT)
________________Jim -:- Yeah, I knew it -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 16:24:59 (EDT)
__________________Mike -:- Did you actually expect -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 17:11:08 (EDT)
________________nigel -:- So are you saying -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 08:10:53 (EDT)
__________________GI -:- So are you saying -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 08:15:40 (EDT)
____________________Jim -:- Be fair, GI -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 11:29:11 (EDT)
______________________GI -:- Be fair, GI -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 15:21:52 (EDT)
________________________Jim -:- So? -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 16:52:36 (EDT)
________________________Jim -:- A longer reply -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 19:41:21 (EDT)
__________________________GI -:- A longer reply -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 08:01:50 (EDT)
____________________________Jim -:- Okay, that's that -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 11:59:11 (EDT)
______________________________GI -:- Okay, that's that -:- Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 20:38:07 (EDT)
__________GI -:- So are you saying -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 08:04:02 (EDT)
____________Jim -:- Really? -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:01:40 (EDT)
______________GI -:- Jims sashays around issue -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 22:46:46 (EDT)
________________Jim -:- Sure, Gi, anything you say -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 00:01:59 (EDT)
__________________Victoria -:- To Jim, (OT) -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 00:38:34 (EDT)
____________________Victoria -:- To Jim, (OT) -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 00:39:33 (EDT)
______________________Jim -:- To Jim, (OT) -:- Wed, May 26, 1999 at 00:48:42 (EDT)
____________Mike -:- So are you saying -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:41:29 (EDT)
________Jerry -:- I'd defend him -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 12:50:15 (EDT)
__________Roger E. Drek -:- waiting for Jim's mea culpa -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 13:13:02 (EDT)
____________Jim -:- You're confused -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 14:38:21 (EDT)
__________GI -:- I'd defend him -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 08:12:17 (EDT)
____________Jerry -:- I'd defend him -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:02:28 (EDT)
______________Jethro -:- I'd defend him -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:55:39 (EDT)
____________Mike -:- So who died and left you Judge -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 12:49:01 (EDT)
______________Judge Drek -:- Solomon died GI is de Judge -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 15:01:35 (EDT)
________________Mickey the Pharisee -:- Is GI really SHP? -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 18:00:11 (EDT)
________Jim -:- Come back here, ya' jerk! -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 23:21:51 (EDT)
__________Gail -:- GI JOE will be back--he's got -:- Mon, May 24, 1999 at 23:31:24 (EDT)
____________Zac -:- Crazy thread -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 08:00:05 (EDT)
__GI -:- Jim's ethics (way OT, sorry) -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 07:44:05 (EDT)
____Jim -:- Figures -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:55:16 (EDT)
______Copta' Buzz -:- Figures -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 11:21:42 (EDT)
________Batman -:- The Justice League -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 11:38:00 (EDT)
____Mike -:- Solo...who?????? -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 12:55:13 (EDT)
______Roger E. Drek -:- fairy tale world -:- Tues, May 25, 1999 at 16:12:10 (EDT)


Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 18:52:47 (EDT)
From: Zac
Email: None
To: Everyone
Subject: Catweasel is an X premie
Message:
Here's why!

He doesn't really listen to maharaji or try to do what Maharaji asks.

He isn't fooled by the Lord trip and only gives a pitance when he feels like it. Nothing that would hurt mind you.

He never hangs with premies. They are such bores.

He rarely attends videos and does so just for laughs.

He loves to be on the X forum.

He thinks maharaji can be whatever he wants as long as he doesn't fuck with him.

He thinks service is for suckers.

These are what I can gather from his posts. Yet he hangs here like shp argueing for the sake of it. Why doesn't he get his ID card and argue with the premies that show up? They are no fun and he's blind in both eyes and has no clue which end is up. He's an idiotic moron. That's what you called me isn't C.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 19:49:43 (EDT)
From: Mary M
Email: None
To: Zac
Subject: Catweasel is an
Message:
androgynous platypus. I don't know why he keeps calling you an 'idiotic moron'. His choice of adjectives never ceases to amaze me.

Cat claims to flame 'the rest of the Bozos here'.

I disagree Cat. I think you have a long way to go before you've accomplished the fine art of flaming!

The Art of Flaming

Any wannabe with a keyboard can ignite a firestorm of ill-conceived and boring flames. It takes diligence and creativity to pull off an artful flame.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 20:52:06 (EDT)
From: Robyn
Email: sundogs@hotmail.com
To: Mary M
Subject: Catweasel is an
Message:
Dear Zac and Mary,
Zac, sounds like you are on to something there with CW. I bet he knows it too. Like it said in Happy's joureny entry lots of people with real problems are allowed in, I guess to help the numbers.
Mary, platypuses are cute, don't insult them so. :)
Love,
Robyn
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 04:45:27 (EDT)
From: catweasel
Email: Funny
To: Mary M
Subject: Catweasel is an
Message:
Whoa ,touchy are'nt we?A question of ownership here, no doubt!
Sure you dont care Mary.Of course it does'nt affect you! I'll bet your so smart ,they've been holding a spot for you at Harvard for twenty years.But you've just been TOO busy!You Mensa candidate you!!!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 07:39:47 (EDT)
From: Mary M
Email: None
To: catweasel
Subject: Catweasel is an
Message:
Better Cat.

You're getting there.

xo,
Mary
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 19:50:39 (EDT)
From: Sky King '.out of the blu
Email: None
To: Zac
Subject: 'Idiotic Moron??'
Message:
Whoever used it ......Thats a double negative

Maybe we should take it easy on Catmeasel.

By the amount of amps he puts into his posts, he sound like he u
is using the forum as a therapy or hot line to keep one toe in.

The forum might be keeping him sane for all we know.

He sounds VERY strung out.

Maybe he needs a 'talking stick thread'
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 04:36:34 (EDT)
From: Catweasel
Email: None
To: Zac
Subject: Zac's an IMBECILE!!!!!!!
Message:
Zac, your easily sucked in!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 11:43:10 (EDT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: Catweasel
Subject: Yes, he is
Message:
Cat,

You hit the nail on the head again! You're a breath of fresh air, ol' buddy. Thanks for being here.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 14:17:56 (EDT)
From: Zac
Email: None
To: Catweasel
Subject: That's it??? X-Cat
Message:
I'm easily sucked in? I'm out, not in. But your not easily sucked in are you? In fact you never got in did you? You just hang this knowledge trip on the wall for decoration in your life. And the X page is making the picture you hang not look so pretty. So you come on here and try to make this place look a mess like your so called life is.

Question: Which do you prefer? watching a MJ video or hitting the bookmark for the X forum. Don't bother I know the answer.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 16:35:10 (EDT)
From: Gail
Email: None
To: Zac
Subject: Catweasel, think for a minute
Message:
For years we have been told what to think. We have learned to view the world through the master's eyes. I know I used to repeat his words and ideas because I was so enthralled with who he was.

I remember going to see him in 1991 in Miami. He did a complete about face and told us that everything was over when we died (no afterlife). All we could do was experience K now. I remember thinking that this was a real kick in the face. I didn't experience that much in my day-to-day living. I hated the dicipline and demands of it all. I also wondered how he could be the Lord when he said there would be nothing after life. What's the point?

He has done many about faces. How did we get from liberation, reincarnation, and karma to no afterlife and enjoying life. He has even changed the techniques of K. If you ask me, I think the whole thing keeps evolving to keep MJ at the top. You and I both know that the message is not the same. I have a copy of the 1979 Holi program if you have any doubts.

We have been incredibly high--I'll give you that, but at what price. We wanted to feel something, so we allowed ourselves to. I'm no Dawkins expert, but the idea of brain chemistry makes a lot of sense. I also agree with Zac about you being here. This site is facinating for you. Enjoyinglife.org diatribe is so fake. Never mind saving me; how about you?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 10:31:37 (EDT)
From: Catweasel
Email: Not even close
To: Gail
Subject: Here's the Mail ,Gail!
Message:
the orange bowl Huh?Yeah I was there,and it was great.Do you remember the story of the master and the bucket full of holes.Think about it and then think about your own dilemma.No, I dont want to save you. Its not 'fascinating'here.Not even challenging,rather predictable really.A bit like the Marx Bros'DUCK SOUP' only not as funny.

nt want to'save you'And no,your off beam about me.Ijust have
Return to Index -:- Top of Index


Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 10:17:29 (EDT)
From: Catweasel
Email: None
To: Zac
Subject: That's it??? X-Cat
Message:
Zac its not a book mark ,its a dopey bogus loser,who keeps putting his head up. Looked in the mirror lately?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 18:32:43 (EDT)
From: Marianne
Email: None
To: Everyone
Subject: Soul Rush book
Message:
Hi everyone. I am still in my court hearing, but have had part of a day's respite from the proceedings. As promised some time ago, I have re-read Sophia Collier's book 'Soul Rush' to see what it contains that might be useful to various ex sites. It turns out to be a very important historical document.
Sophia joined DLM in early 1973. She was 16 or 17 and lived in Maine. She soon moved to Boston and because of various skills she had, was sent to Houston to work on Millenium preparations. The book contains lots of information about what was happening during this time period; about BalBhagwan Ji's dire disaster predictions; about predictions that hundreds of thousands would attend the festival, etc.
Sophia was sent back to Boston to help with preparations for Soul Rush. Soul Rush was a cross country bus tour of premies which stopped in a number of cities and held programs and concerts to advise the general public that the Lord of the Universe had arrived and was going to be in Houston for the Millenium '73 celebration in November at the Houston astrodome. I was a part of Soul Rush as was Mary M, & others who regularly post here. It is Mary's belief that Soul Rush was set up to dispose of surplus apple butter that DLM had acquired, because that was the mainstay of our diet during the tour. Sophia was on Soul Rush too. I remember her as a good spirit and a good sport. She worked hard.
Sophia talks about the debacle that Millenium was, how it nearly bankrupted DLM, and how foolish it made the doomsday prophesies of members of M's family, and DLM heavies, appear.
Sophia was in Denver at nat'l headquarters for a couple of years -- 73 - 76. She was near the top and saw the beginning of the end of this period of DLM history. She left the cult around the same time I did in '76. She talks about M and Marolyn getting together; about Raja Ji and Claudia; about the schism in the 'holy family' over M's marriage; about seeing Claudia and Raja Ji drinking and generally out of it (Her observation: So this is enlightenment??????). She describes how Michael Dettmers came in and took over national headquarters, and that his entry onto the scene is what turned DLM into a corporate entity, a transformation which revolted Sophia and caused her to get out. This part of the book is truly fascinating for those of us interested in the organizational development. Unintentionally I think, because we can only see this given historical developments, Sophia identifies and describes the beginnings of the Cash is King philosophy which has completely overtaken the cult, to the benefit of those who initiated it way back when.
After she left DLM, Sophia had/has many accomplishments. She started Soho Soda, which was (is????) an incredibly successful natural drink company. I believe she is now the CEO of Working Assets, a progressive investment company. I've seen her interviewed on tv a few times and have always been impressed with her. She remains idealistic and committed to making the world a better place today. I'm glad I bought this book years ago and held onto it when I purged my groaning bookcases.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 20:14:51 (EDT)
From: Helen
Email: None
To: Marianne
Subject: Soul Rush book
Message:
Hi Marianne
Thanks for the excellent book review!! It sounds like a very interesting read. Glad to hear that Sophia bounced back from apple butter madness.
I can't think of SOul Rush without thinking of Mary's fuck you/honeymoon stories. They are legend now!!
Take care Marianne!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 20:40:39 (EDT)
From: Gail
Email: None
To: Helen
Subject: Please explain Honeymoon
Message:
stories. Also, is Soulrush still in print?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 21:52:47 (EDT)
From: Marianne
Email: None
To: Gail
Subject: Please explain Honeymoon
Message:
Hi Gail! How are you? I don't know if this book is still in print. Pretty interesting, given our roots, huh? Mary will have to explain the honeymoon stuff.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 23:10:18 (EDT)
From: Liz
Email: None
To: Marianne
Subject: Please explain Honeymoon
Message:
Hi Marianne,

Glad to see you back, however temporarily. Soul Rush sound great. How about some snippets of raja Ji & Claudia's drunken stupors? More on the honeymoon would be welcome, Mary or whoever.

Love,

Liz
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 07:38:57 (EDT)
From: Mary M
Email: None
To: Liz
Subject: Please explain Honeymoon
Message:
Hi Liz & Gail,

I'll dig those dillies up from the archives soon.

Luv,
Mare
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 17:00:29 (EDT)
From: Mary M
Email: None
To: Marianne & Roger
Subject: Entity Relationship Diagram
Message:
She describes how Michael Dettmers came in and took over national headquarters, and that his entry onto the scene is what turned DLM into a corporate entity, a transformation which revolted Sophia and caused her to get out.

Well that explains Mr Cleans involvement with all those penny stock companies in the seventies.

So all, do we start the ERD with Mr Clean & Purus Inc?

Luv,
Mare
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 11:18:04 (EDT)
From: Jerry
Email: None
To: Everyone
Subject: Cool Website
Message:
Dreamstate, A Digital Story
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:32:00 (EDT)
From: Depressed
Email: None
To: Everyone
Subject: Devil and Dan'l Rawat
Message:
Today's thoughts: what if despite all the christian bullshit and myth, one can sell their soul to the devil!

Did I sell my soul to the guru 25 years ago? Is it too late? Will I ever be able to look back and just laugh at my ignorance, i.e. trusting him?

It seems obvious to me that all x's and active premies that post or lurk here are trapped and they know it. We want out but there is NO EXIT. Why else would we have any interest in this forum?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:42:56 (EDT)
From: Catweasel
Email: None
To: Depressed
Subject: Devil and Dan'l Rawat
Message:
Good point Depressed,its self evident.But this the dark side.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:13:14 (EDT)
From: Victoria
Email: None
To: Depressed
Subject: Devil and Dan'l Rawat
Message:
Dear Depressed,

Sometimes I look back and laugh.

Catweasel's wrong, this is not the dark side.

We are free now.

Things will get better, life is good. Sometimes, when life seems not so good, at least we don't have that black/white guru-is-giver-of-all-good and mind-is-responsible-for-all-bad shit to deal with. You know?

Love,
Victoria
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:27:30 (EDT)
From: Depressed
Email: None
To: Victoria
Subject: Devil and Dan'l Rawat
Message:
Thanks you're a sweetheart! As a creature of habit, I just find it very difficult to escape the horrible programming I asked to get from the guru. My fault. It's funny but in essence, I bought into a get rich quick scheme. The joke is-it was for the LOTU.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:41:17 (EDT)
From: Helen
Email: None
To: Depressed
Subject: Devil and Dan'l Rawat
Message:
I agree with Victoria that things do get better. I do NOT think I am trapped by the guru in any way, shape, or form. He holds no glamour for me anymore after spending about 6 months hanging out on this website. Yes, you were hoodwinked by a business scam, but you gave him your soul and now you can to reclaim it as your own. We should never have given our power to him. It's all about POWER

Please don't despair, Depressed. Remember, depression can sometimes be repressed anger!! Get angry and wash the guru out of your life. Don't beat up yourself too hard. You say it was 'your fault' but after all you thought he was the Lord, he said he was the Lord. Therapy helps too, don't forget, you don't have to do it alone.
Helen
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 14:52:12 (EDT)
From: Jerry
Email: None
To: Helen
Subject: Devil and Dan'l Rawat
Message:
We should never have given our power to him. It's all about POWER

You've said this in the past, Helen, and I was struck by it, then, when you did. This is so true. If I had had a sense of power in my life, that I was the captain of my soul, I never would have turned to Maharaji. He preys on the powerless, or at least those who mistakenly think they are.

Gerry recently posted about toxic messages. I think having been raised that we were obliged to God is such a message. I think this message also creates a sense of powerlessness in a person's life and gives charlatans such as M the opportunity to take advantage of us. I'm sure you disagree with this but that's the way I've come to see it. If I had never believed in God, I never would have believed in M, either.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 20:03:52 (EDT)
From: Helen
Email: None
To: Jerry
Subject: Devil and Dan'l Rawat
Message:
Hey Jerry, my dear,
Well...I was not raised to think I was obliged to God. My religion taught me that I was obliged to others. I still believe this, that we have obligations to our families and communities and to ourselves. Noone told me when I was growing up that I was obliged to God.
I do see what you're saying though, and believe me, I have mulled this God stuff over in my mind a lot since posting on the forum. You know I like the idea of God and I think some people (like me) need to believe in God in order to have meaning in their lives. But I'm not really sure what God is anymore, and I think that probably this is all there is (our life here). In other words, I don't know if there is an afterlife. And there are plenty of people who find that it's enough to just do what you love and find meaning in living and loving and who don't need 'god'. People like you, I would guess judging from your post to Gail on the meaning of life.

As far as power goes, I know that religion can fill people with fear and they can make god into a superego watching & judging their every move. I wasn't brought up with that, but I know that religion can be very destructive.

This idea of power is important to me these days. People need to feel that they have some power over their lives and in their relationships and jobs, etc. The whole dynamic with Maharaji is all about someone else having all the power and the devotee giving up his or her critical thinking. Maharaji is greater than and the devotee is less than. Premies will deny this til they are blue in the face and yet pranam/kiss feet, loving the feeling of being an ant under his toenail. It's a kind of spiritual rape, I don't have words for it. It's very undignified, very unrespectful of the individual.

I just think people can be spiritual and powerful, God doesn't have to be a power-robber, you know? You all here have made me question so that I'm not sure what I beleive anymore but that's okay. Maybe one day I'll wake up and I won't believe in God anymore, I don't know. I don't really care as long as I still take my obligations seriously, have values, and still can grab life by the balls and feel fortunate to be alive. I am really enjoying your posts lately.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 09:10:59 (EDT)
From: Jerry
Email: None
To: Helen
Subject: Devil and Dan'l Rawat
Message:
This idea of power is important to me these days. People need to feel that they have some power over their lives and in their relationships and jobs, etc. The whole dynamic with Maharaji is all about someone else having all the power and the devotee giving up his or her critical thinking.

This cannot be stressed enough, Helen. M has no power in anybody's lives other than what we give him. But what's given can also be taken away. It's very important to realize this. M is only as big or small as we make him.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 16:48:13 (EDT)
From: Helen
Email: None
To: Jerry
Subject: Power
Message:
I agree 100%. He don't get nothing from me no more. My breath my life my money my thoughts belong to me. He has economic power to do whatever he wants, off the backs of the premies. This is exploitation of the worst kind. Premies need to see that there is a disconnect if they want to help exploited people--they are exploited by M. But like you said they can get their power back. They just have to face the naked truth --that's the hard part.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:45:10 (EDT)
From: Victoria
Email: None
To: Depressed
Subject: Devil and Dan'l Rawat
Message:
Dear Depressed,

Thanks, I like sweetheart.

It's not your fault, though. Maybe this is part of your depression, thinking it is your fault. We were in the wrong place at the wrong time, that's all...not your fault. Let go of that, let some of the programming work for you and surrender the guilt of fault. It is not yours, sweetheart.

Love,
Victoria
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 11:44:48 (EDT)
From: Milton
Email: None
To: Victoria
Subject: If this is hell...
Message:
I'd rather be a king in hell than a servant in Maharaji's heaven!

If the the Forum is the dark side then I assume you're saying Maharaji's world is the light side? Is that the place where his high priests whack people on the head with hammers and molest children and he sits on a throne and screams, screaches and threatens?

Sounds like one sick heaven to me.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 23:00:46 (EDT)
From: Victoria
Email: None
To: Milton
Subject: To Milton
Message:
Dear Milton,

I agree with you, it is one sick heaven Catweasel is referring to as 'the light side.'

Your post was addressed to me, but actually, I think you meant to say it to Catweasel.

Love,
Victoria

P.S. Hi, I don't think I've ever crossed posts with you before. When did you get/leave m&k?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 01:53:46 (EDT)
From: Roger E. Drek
Email: None
To: Victoria
Subject: I was just being sneaky (nt)
Message:
adsf
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 12:49:10 (EDT)
From: JW
Email: None
To: Depressed
Subject: Devil and Dan'l Rawat
Message:
Did I sell my soul to the guru 25 years ago? Is it too late? Will I ever be able to look back and just laugh at my ignorance, i.e. trusting him?

I can't speak for you, but for me, the answers to those questions are: yes, no and yes. (Although 'sell' is incorrect in my case; I just gave my soul away, believing the Maharaji deceitful hype. 'Sell' also implies we actually got something in return, which we didn't.)

Although it's confronting to face the fact that we gave ourselves to something and someone unworthy of our gifts, and there can be an incredible feeling of let down, a feeling of loss for the wasted years of our lives, guilt for the way we hurt our families, etc., as well as a felling of foolishness, in reality, that's when things really start to get better and you start to get your life back. It's when you repress those feelings, like most premies do most of the time, that you really stagnate and don't grow. That's what being a premie was -- a process of repression, leading to stagnation.

I can say for myself, that once I left the cult my life began to improve immensely. I became much happier than I ever was in the cult, except perhaps during the first few months of euphoria I had when I first got involved and never had since, except possibly during a couple of programs when I was carried on by the 'group high.' I started to remember what it felt like before I was ever in the cult. It felt like I could breathe again -- like I got back in touch with the old me. I also found that I started to really enjoy other people, the world, my interests, and I started to lose all the guilt that was associated with being a premie.

As to why ex-premies get involved with this site, there are a number of reasons I can think of.

Some ex-premies are just recently out of the cult and need support. I think we've seen a good 20 or so people post that after reading this website, it gave them the means to finally get out. I'm sure there are a lot more who don't post. It's good to be able to talk to others who know what you are talking about. You have to give yourself time. If you were in the cult for 25 years, you can't expect to just drop it all and forget it in a few months. It just doesn't work that way.

Some ex-premies have been away a long time, and have this feeling that helping others get out of the cult in some way makes up for the wasted years when they dedicated to the lotus toes. Also, Maharaji is currently trying to hide his past -- hide the whole lord of the universe period, and ex-premies are about the only ones who can prevent the little liar from doing so. [For example, pointing out the lies on his website like that he 'never wanted to be a leader' or a 'figurehead.'] Those are blatant lies and the premies who were around are not about to point out that the emperor has no clothes.

I think some ex-premies just find the whole interaction here very interesting. It really can be. The dynamics of a cult, and getting out of a cult are fascinating. They involve such deep committments, mental processes, belief systems, ability to rationalize and repress, and all kinds of other interesting stuff. I also find it fascinating to read what some of the premies have to say, and their pathetic attempts to defend Maharaji and his cult. It's really quite mind-boggling, but at the same time there is this incredible feeling of relief, because I recognize that I used to be just as programmed and spouted the same trash.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 14:53:12 (EDT)
From: Marshall
Email: None
To: depressed
Subject: Devil and Dan'l Rawat
Message:
When I first posted here last year, and explained my odd situation, both my parents are oldtimer premies and I 'got Knowledge' when I was a little kid, JW joked that that was good for at least ten years of therapy.
I thought that was pretty funny, but the truth can be funny sometimes. This forum has really helped me make sense of why my parents, and step parents continue the ridiculous charade of 'following the satguru'.
Although I became an ex early in the game and never took Maharaji or his circus very seriously, I understand all too well the mechanics of addiction and denial. As someone who has struggled with substance abuse half my life, and been through re-habs, therapy, etc. I can relate to what Depressed is saying, about feeling like having sold their soul. I've felt that way during the desperation of hard drug abuse, like it will always plague me, and even in recovery I'll never be totally free from the effects of all I've done.
However, I believe there is light at the end of the tunnel, it's often darkest before the dawn, and any other appropriate sayings I've left out.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 18:17:55 (EDT)
From: Selene
Email: None
To: everybody hurts
Subject: Devil and Dan'l Rawat
Message:
sometimes.
Anyone remember that REM song?

Anyway, I don't agreee really. I am finding more
interest inf life.
I am slowly detaching form here, except to contact
friends.

It happens. You can do what I did, make sure
your burn out hard and fast, but I don't recommend
that road.
It will be ok. everybody hurts, sometimes.

ps still can't fix tyos I mean typos!!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 16:22:14 (EDT)
From: Happy
Email: None
To: Depressed and all
Subject: Devil and Dan'l Rawat
Message:
This was a good thread, I actually printed out excerpts from many of the posts. Thanks to you all. To you Depressed, I wish you all the best. There is a light in the tunnel, but it takes time to get out of the spiritual and mental cult rape.

I agree with Helen when she thinks it would be healthy now to allow tourself to feel real, deep anger towards M. It's a natural and sane reaction, which counters depression.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 00:06:02 (EDT)
From: Gail
Email: None
To: Everyone
Subject: Let's start a Cult of our own
Message:
If we all put our heads together, we could start and maintain a very successful cult. We have a broad expertise of what works and what doesn't. Of course, we would have to surrender our morals. Is anyone up for this? We could call it the FadScrewMe Tradition. We could even sell leather head gadgets that would put blinders on the devotees and allow light and music to be performed hands free (sort of like the S & M hoods) 24 hours per day. Let's hear your ideas.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 00:43:05 (EDT)
From: Stating the Obvious
Email: None
To: Gail
Subject: Let's start a Cult of our own
Message:
You already have, sweetheart.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 01:02:59 (EDT)
From: Runamok
Email: None
To: Stating the Obvious
Subject: Expunging the Oblivious
Message:
Hey S. the O.,

Some things are a matter of magnitude. If I call you an asshole, there has been no murder.

In this case, if we stick together as exes, it compares favorably to fraudlently deceiving people for decades and then discarding them like used toilet paper (from the golden toilet throne).

By the way, S. the O., you are a real asshole.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 03:50:23 (EDT)
From: Disillusioned
Email: None
To: Runamok
Subject: Expunging the Oblivious
Message:
I agree it's a matter of magnitude. If I call you a big angry fart, does that make you an asshole too?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:05:51 (EDT)
From: Catweasel
Email: An age old question?
To: Disillusioned
Subject: Expelling the Obvious
Message:
Well which came first the asshole or the fart?Depends who's in the room?I think that Nigel stinks,or is he just an egg?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:43:43 (EDT)
From: Magnificent Martian
Email: None
To: Disillusioned
Subject: Missing the Obvious
Message:
Disillusioned (Disingenuous?):

I agree it's a matter of magnitude. If I call you a big angry fart, does that make you an asshole too?

I'll provide you with a hint. Saying something doesn't make it so. Now, before you claim that all we're doing here is saying that M is a fraud, read a little more carefully. If we said absolutely nothing he would still be a fraud; it's just that you'd never have any chance of knowing it.

It should be obvious that this isn't a cult. If anything it is marginally routinized skepticism, but given the absence of complete information about the Guru and his minions, or any cult for that matter, this is to be expected. If you don't know the difference between this group and a cult it should be no surprise to anyone that you can be so completely duped.

MM
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:16:45 (EDT)
From: Victoria
Email: None
To: Stating the Obvious
Subject: Let's start a Cult of our own
Message:
Dear S-the-O,

Ex-premie forum is not a cult. We are not enriching a false messiah. We do not view the world in black/white terms; i.e., guru is good, mind is bad, end of story. Leave Gail alone, please.

Sincerely,
Victoria
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 15:15:11 (EDT)
From: Usually Censored
Email: None
To: Victoria
Subject: No Black and White Here
Message:
'We do not view the world in black/white terms; i.e., guru is good, mind is bad, end of story.'

Oh, really? How about this...'guru is bad, doubt is good, premies are all zombiefied fools, anyone having a good/great experience with M & K is delusional and/or lying, M doesn't care about anybody and is only about $, Third-world people are the only people going for knowledge because they don't know any better (talk about stunningly racist and patronizing!), we're liberated free thinkers and premies are glassy-eyed robots and anyone who disagrees with us is a cultist, apologist, brainwashed chowderhead (usually topped off with an 'asshole' for flourish.)

Nah, no black and white there.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 15:50:44 (EDT)
From: Mike
Email: None
To: Usually Censored
Subject: Not censored here!
Message:
The subject-line should be your first clue, UC. UC, prove that he isn't in it for the money or that he really cares for anyone. Proof, not words, P.R.O.O.F. ALL of the physical evidence shows plainly and clearly that he IS only in it for the money and that he cares not a bit for anyone other than himself. In GI's view, he has no defense nor should he have any....he's guilty. Hey don't blame me, it was GI's idea to 'sentence' on evidence without a trial. I'm just using his yardstick!

Now, as for premies.....PROVE that your so-called internal experiences aren't caused by simple biochemistry. Science has said, and proven, that it is. If you take an already existing brain chemical (Dimethyltryptamine) and put it into your body in somewhat larger amounts than normally present.....You'll see god (for about 30 minutes), I promise! The reason that it is gone so quickly is due to the fact that the body KNOWS how to matabolize this chemical very quickly. In other words, it is a completely natural substance that is already present. NO, I'm not advocating illegal substances....I'm stating SCIENTIFIC FACT! Now, once again, tell me that it isn't brain chemistry at work.

By the way, there are quite a number of black and white issues. Murder isn't a grey area, now is it? Robbery, burglary....nope, no grey area there, either. Let's see.....FRAUD....no again. Attempted murder-by-hammer.....nope. So, the issue of black-and-white isn't all encompassing, now is it?

The reason that premies are often referred to a 'chowderheads' is due to the simple fact that they won't truely investigate this stuff for themselves. If they did, they would no longer be premies....It's that simple. We DID, and you will note that we are EX's......and YES, doubt is a VERY good thing! It keeps you alive: I doubt that I can beat that car while jaywalking 'cause it's doin' 100mph!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 18:15:44 (EDT)
From: UC
Email: None
To: Mike
Subject: Let's discuss doubt
Message:
Hi Mike,

I've tried to answer your intelligent and civil post a few times but my ISP appears to be blocked, for some unknown reason.

To respond to your first point, if feelings of love, ecstasy, exaltation, etc. can be explained by biochemistry, that's fine by me. If certain practices or events set off an extremely satisfying chemical reaction that is built into human beings, I'm all for it. I would no sooner care to examine the theoretical basis for the pleasure of an orgasm then I would to arrive at a mechanical explanation of why I've deeply enjoyed practicing knowledge for 26 years. I'm just glad that both are available.

As to the hammer-on-the-head item, yes, it's well known that Fakirinand El-Kabonged that guy in 1973. Get over it.

As to your assertion that premies have never investigated their doubts, and that those who have are exes, that's pretty silly, Mike. Maharaji passed every severe doubt test of mine a long time ago and he did so repeatedly. You think I walk around going 'Geez, who can I follow like a lemming for absolutely no reason?...maybe I can find some guy to throw money at and waste a few decades...I'll just sit here until someone tells me what to do.' In fact, most of the premies I know are rebellious by nature and strangely enough, having spent time with him, so is Maharaji. He doesn't rest on the status quo and regularly shakes up any fossilized or stagnant little belief systems that sprout up.

This may surprise you but I'll challenge one of the core beliefs I see here at ex-premie.org...I think writing off Maharaji as being in it for the $ is one of the lamest and laziest-thinking catch-alls that's espoused here. He's always had money. He never pretended, unlike some other gurus we know, not to enjoy and use money to do what he wanted. This idea that he travels and teaches relentlessly for 30 years, has people wait quite a while to receive knowledge (which costs nothing), so that maybe that person will buy a few $12 videos or the occasional swan-embossed mouse pad is frankly, pretty ludicrous. And I had a huge laugh seeing some people here trying to make the text-book buying company that helps support him into an evil, Stalinist conspiracy. For those that think he's a great, valuable teacher, and there are many, supporting his work AND his play is a pleasure. A voluntary pleasure.

And now to your quote...'YES, doubt is a VERY good thing' I agree with you in many instances...yet in many other instances doubt is perhaps the greatest killer. It's not as simple as you'd like to make it. It all depends on what you're applying the doubt to...and when. You used the example of driving and I think it's advisable to doubt what other drivers are going to do just about all of the time. It's advisable to doubt most business deals, especially with someone you've just met. It's advisable to doubt the speedy delivery of mail and, in some cases, your personal safety at the Post Office.

Here are a few examples of doubt as a killer...notice that they all pertain to high performance activities.

Mid-toss...match point against you...can I get this serve in? Fault.

Finally, first date with Alexandra...can I get the biggest hard-on of all time? Floop.

Gotta get up early...can I get to sleep? Fidget, spasm, eye-bags.

Gotta blow this sax just right...better not honk it. Squeak!

Free-throw time...can I make it? Boiinngggg, I'm sorry.

Married 22 years...loving, still hot, through thick and thin you've stayed tight..phone rings, unknown male asks for your wife. Is she, is she, is she? Blow your top, she can't believe you don't trust her...bye, bye 22 years.

There's not a single champion in any field who'll tell you, 'Yeah, doubt is great! Helps me all the time.' That's why people practice what they do, so they'll be right there and ready when it's time to perform at their highest capacity. Doubt at the wrong time is the mark of a fool. Going back to the 22-year wife example, isn't there a time for you when you finally stop doubting and analyzing someone and accept them as they are? For me, Maharaji has nothing to prove. He's inspired, enlightened and entertained me so many times that to start doubting him at this point, I'd be an ungrateful fool...double-faulting, woodie-losing, free throw bricking, wife-suspecting, self-losing, history-rewriting, doubt-addled fool. But that's me.

For you, perhaps Maharaji falls into the category of postal worker or shifty new business partner. It's up to you who and what you want to continually re-examine through the prism of doubt. I hope there are things and people in your life who you can enjoy unencumbered with that view. It's a hell of a lot more fun.

Best to you, UC
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 19:40:13 (EDT)
From: Mike
Email: None
To: UC
Subject: Let's discuss doubt
Message:
UC: 'He's always had money.' That's not true, UC. His family was not wealthy. They could never have afforded the mansion-on-the-hill without ALOT of premie money. He couldn't have afforded a fleet of Rolls and/or Maserati's, either. I doubt that he could have afforded a gratuitous Rolex, even. He certainly couldn't have afforded a Private Airliner. He didn't inherit his money, it came from premies.

The hammer-throw.....well, I can't just forget it. There is no statute of limitations on murder or attempted murder in this country. I refuse to forget it and M should have never forgotten it, either. Jagdeo....pedaphile....you make the call!

UC, my problem with M is that he hasn't kept a single PROMISE that he ever made. He lied about who he is (e.g. changed his story, LOTU, PM, just a meditation teacher, regular guy). This is a biggie, UC. If he had originally said, 'I'm just a regular guy or I'm just a meditation teacher,' I would have walked away long before receiving the techniques. There were LOTS of meditation teachers; I wanted God incarnate (or someone that was in 'that place,' that could show me how). A pretty tall order, but that was the only thing that would 'do' for me. I wouldn't have wasted my time with a guy that was going to just say 'enjoy your life.' There already was a guy saying that....remember 'Don't Worry, Be Happy?' The 'avatar' of the age said that, remember? I wasn't interested in trite little sayings, I wanted to see god face-to-face....period! Every fibre of my being wanted that experience. Only that experience would 'do.' M PROMISED that experience and it NEVER occurred.

He lied about K, itself (e.g. again, changing the nature of what 'it' is). It went from god-realization, liberation and 'internal LSD' to 'a nice place to enjoy and experience a little peace.' Big whoopie! What a waste of my time (the only thing of real value that I have to give to anyone). His satsangs never 'evolved' with the so-called experiences of the premies. It was always the same old dry non-info. No growth, no path, no nothing.... kinda like K, itself.

Biochemistry is not my forte, but I know enough to know that it is a very plausible and provable explanation for 'spiritual' experiences. I always hoped it was something else, but I couldn't ignore the simple biological facts. My comments concerning DMT are definitely germaine to this discussion. It is a substance that is naturally occurring within the human body. It's exact purpose is not fully understood, yet, but we sure know what happens when you put an excess amount in there, don't we?

The doubts to which I refer are 'survival' doubts. Not doubts about my ability to play tennis. Of course, you must KNOW that you can win, or you won't win. But there is a BIG difference between doubting 'others' and doubting your own, known and proven abilities. Survival-doubting, if you will, 'includes' doubting every single guru that I meet. There are far more scheisters (sic) than there are honest people in this field, obviously. They should be questioned and doubted incessantly. It is THEIR responsibility to quiet my doubts, not mine. THEY are asking me to trust them with the reigns of my life (a pretty important thing to me, personally), so my survival instinct should cause me to doubt them without fail. They, all-knowing gods that they are, should understand this, realize that it is human nature and PROVE themselves. Instead, M just dismisses your miniscule, unimportant doubts with a condescending commandment to 'Leave NO ROOM for doubt in your mind'.......Bull! It's an impossibility. The only way to remove all doubt from your mind is to be dead.....physically dead. Instead of dealing with the doubts of his devoted premies (who are now mostly ex's) head-on, he runs away or 'ignores' it (his words, not mine). What a chicken-sh_t way of dealing with life....run away, run away! (Sorry for the expletive...it's NOT directed at you, obviously!)

I think I covered most of the items in your post and thank you, as well, for your thoughtful post. I look forward to a response.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 23:40:53 (EDT)
From: Victoria
Email: None
To: Usually Censored
Subject: No Black and White Here
Message:
Dear Usually Censored,

Are you the same person as S-the-O?, Could you try a normal name, like a person's name, or at least a regular consistent name, maybe?

Anyway, I can't speak for the other exes, but since you asked me, I'll tell you what I think about your statements...

'guru is bad,

Yes. I think the guru is bad. When I was a recent ex, I thought that everyone ought to have an experience with a guru, but only if they could get out. As an ex c.1978, I have reconciled that guru is bad, anyway you look at it.

doubt is good,

Yes, again. Doubt is good. I am convinced that the only time one should allow the willing suspension of disbelief is when reading literature. In real life, those who don't doubt are taken advantage of repeatedly. This is the voice of experience talking. In fact, this may become my new mantra...doubt is good, doubt is good, doubt is good...thanks.

premies are all zombiefied fools,

No, I don't think so. However, some of the premies posting on this site are probably zombiefied fools. But I would have to meet them face to face and attempt conversation with eye contact, gestures and inflection that comes with real life interaction (as opposed to forum posting) before making such a harsh judgement.

anyone having a good/great experience with M & K is delusional and/or lying,

I myself had a good experience with M & K at one time. Of course, I was delusional at the time. =) But seriously, I don't think anyone denies the good feelings that come from THAT opportunity to surrender to what one believes is GOD incarnate. Sorry, I can't get around 'delusional.' I'm trying. Concentration on your breath can bring peaceful feelings. This is true. Whatever. Concentration itself is quite fullfilling, whatever the object.

M doesn't care about anybody and is only about $,

I have no idea who M cares about, I imagine he cares about his children, but I really don't know. I believe he cares about himself, also. He certainly is very much about money, that is quite obvious.

Third-world people are the only people going for knowledge because they don't know any better (talk about stunningly racist and patronizing!),

Third-world people have limited access to the internet comparatively. Access to information is what helps people know better, as you put it.

we're liberated free thinkers

We are liberated from M's massive disrespect for the mind, which makes us free thinkers, in that respect. When I was a premie, I stopped thinking as much as possible, as I was taught in satsang. Remember--constantly meditate and remember the holy name...I am a premie from those days, not the K-lite days. On the other hand, my thinking (now that I appreciate thinking) is, of course, bound by my prior experiences in life, as I try to learn from my mistakes and successes. My husband is fond of saying 'Life is conditioned and unfree.' I think he may be right.

and premies are glassy-eyed robots

See above, 'zombiefied fools' response.

and anyone who disagrees with us is a cultist, apologist, brainwashed chowderhead

Same as 'zombiefied fools' and 'glassy-eyed robots' response with one qualifier. Many of the exes disagree with each other and disagreement is okay. Discussion and thought are good.

(usually topped off with an 'asshole' for flourish.)

Not me, I've never typed that word here.

Sincerely,
Victoria

P.S. When did you receive k? Do you still practice? Why are you here on the Ex-premie forum?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 19:32:51 (EDT)
From: UC
Email: None
To: Victoria
Subject: No Black and White Here
Message:
Hi Victoria,

To answer your Qs...

Are you the same person as S-the-O?, Could you try a normal name, like a person's name, or at least a regular consistent name, maybe?

I'm not S-the-O. I wrote in as Usually Censored because my ISP appears to be blocked most of the time from this site for reasons unknown.

'Doubt is good. I am convinced that the only time one should allow the willing suspension of disbelief is when reading literature. In real life, those who don't doubt are taken advantage of repeatedly. This is the voice of experience talking. In fact, this may become my new mantra...doubt is good, doubt is good, doubt is good...thanks.'

Allow me to quote from my answer to Mike about doubt. I agree with you in many instances...yet in many other instances doubt is perhaps the greatest killer. It's not as simple as you'd like to make it. It all depends on what you're applying the doubt to...and when. You used the example of driving and I think it's advisable to doubt what other drivers are going to do just about all of the time. It's advisable to doubt all business deals, especially with someone you've just met. It's advisable to doubt the speedy delivery of mail and, in some cases,your personal safety at the Post Office.

Here are a few examples of doubt as a killer...notice that they all pertain to high performance activities.

Mid-toss...match point against you...can I get this serve in? Fault.

Finally, first date with Alexandra...can I get the biggest hard-on of all time? Floop.

Gotta get up early...can I get to sleep? Fidget, spasm, eye-bags.

Gotta blow this sax just right...better not honk it. Squeak!

Free-throw time...can I make it? Boiinngggg, I'm sorry.

Married 22 years...loving, still hot, through thick and thin you've stayed tight..phone rings, unknown male asks for your wife. Is she, is she, is she? Blow your top, she can't believe you don't trust her...bye, bye 22 years.

There's not a single champion in any field who'll tell you, 'Yeah, doubt is great! Helps me all the time.' That's why people practice what they do, so they'll be right there and ready when it's time to perform at their highest capacity. Doubt at the wrong time is the mark of a fool. Going back to the 22-year wife example, isn't there a time for you when you finally stop doubting and analyzing someone and accept them as they are? Or do you trust absolutely noone? I trust Maharaji. He's earned my trust repeatedly. Not many people have.

In response to: 'Third-world people are the only people going for knowledge because they don't know any better (talk about stunningly racist and patronizing!)'

You wrote: 'Third-world people have limited access to the internet comparatively. Access to information is what helps people know better, as you put it.'

This, Victoria, is the weakest part of your post. Are you saying that all accumulated human wisdom, learning and experience up until the last 5 years is somehow null and void beacause people weren't stuck to their monitors with the ability to hear dirt on Jagdeo or order fishing lures and Dutch vibrators over phone lines via their modems? It's still quite patronizing to talk about these people as if they were ignorant because they don't spend/waste their time typing. What makes their bullshit-meter any less discerning then your own? Please answer. Or do the people in India and Africa fall under some kind of sweet but under-informed savage banner?

You said regarding M: 'I have no idea who M cares about, I imagine he cares about his children, but I really don't know. I believe he cares about himself, also. He certainly is very much about money, that is quite obvious.'

Probably useles to discuss this but I'll try. I've seen him up close for many years as well as long distance. I've seen repeatedly his care and concern for all kinds of people. He certainly cares very strongly about the quality of experience that people coming to him have. All kinds of people, arrogant New Yorkers and little, old Nepali women. He's shown great care to me and many people I know. As far as $ goes, it may seem obvious to you but I'd have to say that's a pretty shallow observation. I've been around plenty of people who are ruled and motivated by money and hard as it may be for you to believe, he ain't one of 'em. If you think enjoying and being at ease with money and being 'about money' are the same thing, you're missing something there. He comes from wealth, he's been treated like a king his whole life...you may not like that. But if you've ever known anyone born into wealth, it's not exactly a novelty to them. I've been around him quite a bit and he's 1. Totally unpretentious about what he has and 2. Extremely sensitive to and aware of what others don't have. I find that he handles the whole area with great class and ease. He's not rubbing his hands together going 'Aha! I've got my own plane!' It's all part of an extremely unusual guy doing an extremely unusual job in his own way, not pausing for a second to polish up his gig to be acceptable to some easy, lazy view of 'how a guy like that is supposed to be.' And, in case you haven't noticed, he never pretended not to be rich. It's his other riches that keep many people, including me, fascinated by him.

'When did you receive k? Do you still practice? Why are you here on the Ex-premie forum?'

Early '70s. Yes. I come on occasional forays for a combination of odd entertainment and sincere curiosity as to what has caused this strange bug to grow in some people about M. Then when I see him, it's clear that he isn't the guy being written about here, there's some bizarre projection at work. For whatever it's worth, he's not at all like what I read here, most of which seems to come from some distant galaxy...far, far away

Enjoy yourself, UC
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 21:22:26 (EDT)
From: Gail
Email: None
To: Victoria
Subject: Let's start a Cult of our own
Message:
Thanks for all your support.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 00:14:18 (EDT)
From: Victoria
Email: None
To: Gail
Subject: To Gail
Message:
Dear Gail,

I think you're great. I really enjoy reading your posts. I especially liked the gestalt part about the empty chair...not too far a stretch. Yeah, right.

I can't stand it when I see the premies picking on people who are trying to work things out and then whining about how callous some of the exes are to them...like being called an asshole is the worst thing that could happen, or something, you know? So fucking what! Isn't this grade school stuff, sticks and stones will break my bones, but names will never hurt me and if you can't say something nice, then don't say anything at all??? I think that many of us fell victim to the whole trip in the first place because we were brought up to be so damn nice! We didn't just say fuck off! in the first place. We had to listen and let them say their stuff, over and over and over and over and over and over again. You know?

Mostly, I see that you're strong here on the forum, but it still bugs me when they pick on you.

You wrote: Somehow I got god mixed up with K. When I stopped believing that K was the ultimate experience of god, I was left in the cold. Even if god exists, what does it want with me? I'm rather small in the whole scheme of things. My days of looking for god are over. I have no heart or soul--I'm just a physical unit. There is no ultimate purpose or destination. Things are random.

I can relate to what you are saying. It is an incredible relief to be free of looking for that special meaning in all random occurences, don't you think? I have no heart or soul does sound pretty bleak, though. Are you okay? You can e-mail me if you want, vico87@aol.com, I think heart and soul are still there, they just aren't defined by m anymore and it takes a while to find yourself. You know?

Love,
Victoria
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 04:58:17 (EDT)
From: Catweasel
Email: Blind Leading theBlind
To: Victoria
Subject: You've Got One!!Enjoy
Message:
A cult doesnt have to enrich anyone ,thats your get-out clause.
Reality says your all obssessed and one dimensional.Whats the glue
that holds you here?Your belief structures and a tenuous link to a distant past,thats all thats here!Read Depressed's post.
Like I said,you're on the Dark side,but as the saying goes'Ignorance is Bliss'.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 10:37:43 (EDT)
From: Victoria
Email: None
To: Catweasel
Subject: You've Got One!!Enjoy
Message:
Dear Catweasel,

A cult doesnt have to enrich anyone ,thats your get-out clause.

I don't know what you're talking about. Fanatical religious cults always enrich their cult leaders. Open up your eyes.

Reality says your all obssessed and one dimensional.

Reality says, Society says, History says...this is a logical fallacy, CW, please don't quote Reality, whoever she may be. I think you are the one who is obsessed, no matter how many breaks I take from the forum, you are still here saying the same (one-dimensional?) things. Yes, we have lives outside of the forum (do you remember reading this before?), I imagine you have a life, also, probably you work? have a family? clean your litter box?

Whats the glue that holds you here?

I don't feel glued here, but I like to check in now and then. Prior to discovering the forum, discussions of having devoted myself to the Living Lord usually had no point of reference for others. In fact, they just didn't get it all, it was too funny, pitiful even, ridiculous. Here on the forum, exes know what it was really like and there is some genuine discussion and respect for what happened, a connection, Catweasel...not just some bizarro trip that isolates you from the real world.

Your belief structures

Exes do not share belief structures. Maybe we share one particular belief destructuring.

and a tenuous link to a distant past,

Not so distant for some, CW, not really tenuous either. I feel I can count on my forum friends now, much more than I could count on my premie friends then, or Maraji either of course, but that goes without saying (since he never said much to me, the link between m and myself was just a figment of my imagination).

thats all thats here!

No, it isn't. There are many, many discussions that take place on this forum on many topics, including links to other websites.

Read Depressed's post.

I did read those posts. It seems obvious to me that all x's and active premies that post or lurk here are trapped and they know it. We want out but there is NO EXIT. Why else would we have any interest in this forum?

I imagine this is the part you were referring to? NO EXIT is a book by Jean-Paul Sartre describing existentialist angst. Yes, there is no exit. We did it and now we can't undo it. I don't feel trapped by it, I survived without the ex forum for 20 years and if it disappeared tomorrow, I would continue to survive. My interest in the forum is in extending support to others, and yes, sharing a history with others who've been there. Really, CW, I have issues that I never dealt with back then because nobody understood it. My grandmother's funeral, CW. The time I surrendered my body as a vessel of GOD, following Gurucharanand's prescription in satsang, and almost ended up in a white slavery ring in Mexico for the rest of my life, CW. The way I can just shut down in the face of conflict, just breathe, don't think, stay open...what the fuck? M never helped me in those moments...k taught me to disregard and avoid as a means of dealing with conflict!

Like I said,you're on the Dark side,

Like I said, this is not the dark side, not for me. Maybe for you it would be too dark to handle.

but as the saying goes'Ignorance is Bliss'.

I thought the saying was Truth is the consciousness of bliss. What bullshit. Bliss consciousness is all in your mind, your innocent, childlike mind. You can have it. Why are you here?

I'm not confident of a considered reply on your part, just writing this for myself and others actually. I'm familiar with your one-liner dismissals of people who try to actually converse with you.

Sincerely,
Victoria

P.S. Unless of course you are going to pounce on my personal stuff, my grandmother's funeral, white slavery, conflict resolution skill development...we are all vulnerable, CW, we're just people here, not God Incarnate like your guru. The difference is we respond where he is a great void. Is that why you come to the Ex site? Because we respond?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 14:41:02 (EDT)
From: Mike
Email: None
To: Victoria
Subject: That's a fact.....
Message:
Victoria: 'Exes do not share belief structures'

If CatWhiskers would like an example, he should read the forum archives between JW and me. I don't think there is a single political issue upon which we wholly agree (outside what we think of M). He's an ultra-liberal and I'm a raving conservative (just kidding, JW). Yet, we can discuss and cuss and enjoy the debate.

Shared belief systems.....what a hoot! We have shared-knowledge... knowledge of a con-artist that preys upon honest people's most sensitive/private area....their humanity!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 22:33:08 (EDT)
From: Helen
Email: None
To: Victoria & Catweasle
Subject: You've Got One!!Enjoy
Message:
Whoo hoo!! Great post, Victoria. I really resent someone so negative and mean (catweasel) telling US we're on 'the dark side'!!!!!! SHEESH.
'Yes, Luke, Princess Leia and all you other action figures, leave Maharaji and come with me, you can do it,' said Darth Vador, and like lemmings we all dropped our lightsabers and turned to the dark side. (scary epic musical score in the background)
SHEESH
Catweasle, you are a mean little coward. you can't have a normal conversation with anyone here. I don't want to engage in any kind of conversation with you because you don't have any social skills. You are one big knee jerk reaction & all you have done is show your tremendous immaturity. Your mamma & your pappa would be embarrassed to read this stuff you've written. My God, get some dignity for yourself!!!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 10:45:56 (EDT)
From: Catweasel
Email: Weasel??
To: Helen
Subject: You've Got One!!Enjoy
Message:
Silly,Silly Helen, the mean catweasel is not real,or hadnt you picked it!Churlish Helen!It is the dark side,the dark side of the MOON!!!!!Cat=killer Weasel=carrion feeder.Drop dead Fred?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 12:34:49 (EDT)
From: Helen
Email: None
To: Catweasel
Subject: Whatever (nt)
Message:
hojhmlhlh
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 10:39:41 (EDT)
From: Catweasel
Email: Like I said
To: Victoria
Subject: You've Got One!!Enjoy
Message:
Like the cargo cult?Like the Tribal cults world wide?Voodoo? Who collects for you?Go on tell me No-one.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 12:44:44 (EDT)
From: Magnificent Martian
Email: None
To: Catweasel
Subject: You've Got None
Message:
Catweasel:

Like the cargo cult?Like the Tribal cults world wide?Voodoo? Who collects for you?Go on tell me No-one.

Never heard of the cargo cult. Maybe that's were my airline luggage goes. Tribal (neolithic) and voodoo (derived from neolithic) 'cults' are highly authoritarian and are appropriately identified as 'segmented societies,' which means they are not only authoritarian but have rigidly defined social structures from which individuals may not deviate. Neither are anything like the ex-premie group, which has no social order, and where any belief may be attacked by anyone. You're just blowing smoke fella, primarily because you've got nothing positive to say about the gurunoids and their devious leader. As for 'collections' you know perfectly well that no one is being enriched here. We need not defend anything. Even the most casual observer would agree there is not anything cult-like about the ex-premie group. Only a deluded and assinine premie would think otherwise. Not all premies are assinine, and I suspect many would be embarassed by you. I suspect your family has been embarassed by you for years.

MM
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, May 28, 1999 at 06:28:04 (EDT)
From: Catweasel
Email: None
To: Magnificent Martian
Subject: Insignificant Martian!
Message:
Never heard of the cargo cult?I do believe you are from Mars!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 15:23:20 (EDT)
From: Victoria
Email: None
To: Catweasel
Subject: You've Got One!!Enjoy
Message:
Like I said, Catweasel, one-liner dismissal, okay it was two lines. Let me rephrase that to: I expect your response to be an unintelligible one or two-line dismissal.

Sincerely,
Victoria
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, May 28, 1999 at 06:33:35 (EDT)
From: Catweasel
Email: None
To: Victoria
Subject: You've Got One!!Enjoy
Message:
So ,who cares?P>sDo you realise that Mel Bourne is sitting right astride your southern waterway?I hope you have protection!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 01:15:35 (EDT)
From: Magnificent Martian
Email: None
To: Catweasel
Subject: You've Got One!!Enjoy
Message:
Weasel:

Re: A cult doesnt have to enrich anyone ,thats your get-out clause.

Huh??? What the heck does that mean, and who needs a get-out clause? I guess if I were to pass some sort of judgement on the Shakers I'd have to agree that they were cult-like, and that they didn't enrich anyone disproportionately. So, are you saying EV/DLM can be compared with the Shakers in any way?

Reality says your all obssessed and one dimensional. Whats the glue that holds you here? Your belief structures and a tenuous link to a distant past,thats all thats here! Read Depressed's post.

Um... yeah, we all belonged to a cult. We have that in common. It does not follow that we are either obsessed or one dimensional. Quite the contrary. I post more to an endurance sport newsgroup than I do here. I suspect you are simply, and typically, overestimating your own significance. We have seen thousands like you.

Like I said,you're on the Dark side,but as the saying goes'Ignorance is Bliss'.

The 'Dark Side,' really? Like Darth Vador, you mean? Yeah, you're real clever. Truth is the consciousness of ignorance. :-)

MM
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 03:19:29 (EDT)
From: Catweasel
Email: None
To: Gail
Subject: Let's start a Cult of our own
Message:
What do you mean start ?Its here and has been operational for as long as you've been running this site
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 04:54:37 (EDT)
From: nigel
Email: nigel@redcrow.demon.co.uk
To: Catweasel
Subject: You're so full of crap...
Message:
- We have no leaders.

- We think for ourselves.

- We have no shared belief system.

- Nobody is getting rich.

- The site runs at a loss.

- Nothing is expected of 'members' (besides restraining from making threats - a point that has clearly been lost on you).

- We help each other.

- We tolerate criticism (even prize pillocks like you are allowed to post).

- Nobody is taught that they 'ought' to be members.

- Nobody is warned of dire consequences through leaving.

- This 'cult' is fun. Yours isn't.

- We are interested in the truth - not an edited version of it.

- We don't have to watch videos (though LOTU is admittedly very popular when you want to invite some friends round and have a good laugh).

- Nobody serves or is expected to 'show gratitude'.

- Some people meditate - some don't. It's no big deal.

- We don't need propagation to attract newcomers, and there is no shortage of them (one-way traffic, you might say).

- We don't consider being on the forum as more important than caring about family or friends.

- We discuss things.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 07:24:15 (EDT)
From: cp
Email: None
To: crap
Subject: You're so full of crap...
Message:
It always makes me chuckle when I see premies posting here saying that we all have this or that belief.
What a joke.
I disagree with 99% of the viewpoints here --except for the viewpoints about M- then it it is more like 100%.

The only reason I see that premies would say something like that is that their own cult has its own dogma of accepted behavior and beliefs.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:07:44 (EDT)
From: Catweasel
Email: None
To: cp
Subject: You're so full of crap...
Message:
Your quick to define ?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 08:59:41 (EDT)
From: Catweasel
Email: This is really funny!
To: nigel
Subject: You're so full of yourself...
Message:
Your'e a true believer then?You schmuck!What was that then ,your manifesto?Or is that the basis of membership here,a sort of policies and procedures for X's? Jesus wept!You poor dumb bastard.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:21:56 (EDT)
From: Jerry
Email: None
To: Catweasel
Subject: You're so full of yourself...
Message:
Cat, why don't you just give it up? Everything Nigel said was dead on true. Name one point he made that wasn't. Just one.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:35:27 (EDT)
From: Catweasel
Email: None
To: Jerry
Subject: You're so full of yourself...
Message:
Jerry,Jerry,Jerry,your so tiring and so bloody boring!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:41:20 (EDT)
From: Jerry
Email: None
To: Catweasel
Subject: You're so full of yourself...
Message:
And you can't think of one point that Nigel made that isn't true. Can you?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:21:31 (EDT)
From: Victoria
Email: None
To: Catweasel
Subject: You're so full of yourself...
Message:
Catweasel, Catweasel, Catweasel, you're so tiring and so bloody boring!

Sincerely,
Victoria
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 11:59:41 (EDT)
From: What it is
Email: None
To: Catweasel
Subject: Cat is making our case
Message:
No, Catweasel is a good thing to have here as obnoxious as he is.

Why? Because he is the product of his cult, Maharaji's cult.

He is setting a wonderful example of what a premie is - sick in the head.

So, when you are examining the Cat's scat just know that many premie lurkers and the general public are seeing the same sweet terse responses. How proud they must be of you, Cat. You are the shining example of what Maharaji's Knowledge provides, that peace, that experience, that understanding.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:47:22 (EDT)
From: Jethro
Email: None
To: Jerry
Subject: to Jerry : not be read by CW
Message:
Jerry,

Catweasal has a large blindspot, mainly because his head is stuck permenently up his rectum. Wacth him call me boring now, it's cw's standard answer.

I did offer to send cw some laxative to clear his throat but he never took up the offer.

Jethro
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 05:06:25 (EDT)
From: Catweasel
Email: Listen to a story
To: Jethro
Subject: No not RED
Message:
Jethro ,you need to stop bonking Elly-May before Jed finds out!!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 14:02:19 (EDT)
From: Jethro
Email: None
To: Catweasel
Subject: No not RED
Message:
You are a true shining example of the living lord.

PS have you asked Lee about th e'fuck you' video your lord made yet?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 22:21:00 (EDT)
From: TD
Email: None
To: Catweasel
Subject: Do you sniff glue Catty, or...
Message:
Your'e a true believer then?You schmuck!What was that then ,your manifesto?Or is that the basis of membership here,a sort of policies and procedures for X's? Jesus wept!You poor dumb bastard.

...just practice K too much?Thank god your'e here Catty , because by virtue of being your own idiotic self,you are a great indication to lurkers of what premies are like and what premiedom can do to the poor ole brain-you certainly save us a lot of time'n'effort.And call me petty Catty,but Iv'e also picked up on your'e style of punctuation-d'ya mind?Oh and why did Jesus weep,you poor premie bastard?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 05:28:54 (EDT)
From: Catweasel
Email: None
To: TD
Subject: You Wish...More Propaganda
Message:
You'd fit in well at the KKK.Just substitute Nigger,Jew,etc,etc for Premie and Jesse Jackson[when did he leave the Band???] for M.
Hell, I reckon you'll make a fabulous Zealot!!!!!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 07:28:18 (EDT)
From: TD
Email: None
To: Catweasel
Subject: You're no premie Catty!
Message:
Thanks Catty for your response. It just confirmed the thread above that Zac started about where you're coming from...
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 07:51:19 (EDT)
From: Catweasel
Email: None
To: TD
Subject: You're a soft rooster
Message:
I agree ,I dont fit your quasi-religous idea of whatever it is you think your in denial over,but your so far out there ,your in a total mess.Have a look at what your saying,do you honestly think any-one outside of your quaint group of fellow mental lepers would have the feintist idea of what your talking about?Your lost in your own strange dream and by the looks of things are going to stay there,for the term of your natural lifeBad luck?Your choice!
Bad choice!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 12:55:19 (EDT)
From: Sister Mary Mae Hem
Email: None
To: Catweasel
Subject: You're a soft rooster
Message:
Weasel, dear didn't I teach you anything in elementary school? I am so humiliated, I need to do a nine-day novena.

'Your' is a the possessive form of the pronoun 'you.' You must NEVER use it when you should be using 'you're' which is a contraction of you are. You're (see?) using 'your' interchangeably in both usages, dear, and it makes you should like an uneducated, stupid, illiterate. My, I have failed.

Also, dear:

The word 'anyone' is not hyphenated.

The word is 'feitest' ['i' before except after 'c' and in except in words rhyming with 'weigh.' Remember?] and not 'fientist' (Oh, dear.)

Your punctuation also sucks, but that is another lesson.

Pray for your immortal soul, dear. Nine 'Our Fathers' and ten 'Hail Marys' is a good start.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 07:45:27 (EDT)
From: Robyn
Email: sundogs@hotmail.com
To: Gail
Subject: Let's start a Cult of our own
Message:
Dear Gail,
My dear we are on the job already, Sir Dave and I and some others, Harry and our own Rodger for example, on Sir's forum. I am the Goddess, don't you like that twist, a female getting the glory! :) Sir had already donated 110%!!! :) I was getting pretty stressed being at the top alone! ;) I am not quite as power hungry as the BM and could easily share the top with lots of ex's.
Let me know... :)
Love,
The Goddess
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 08:14:28 (EDT)
From: The Goddess
Email: sundogs@hotmail.com
To: all
Subject: Let's start a Cult of our own
Message:
Dear all,
I just posted this on Sir's forum also:

I am so pleased to be able to come to you with this news.
Really I JUST heard this on the morning news. It is so wonderful I am going to post it to Gail's, Let's start our own Cult on the Xforum. It has true potential!
Happiness can be seen in a brain scan! It is a spot in the left front lobe. It is basically in the genes but you can work to raise your happiness level.
First work to irradicate, as much as you can, these 3 killers of happiness.
1. Depression
2. Irritablility
3. Fear, a friend has a great saying, Fear is just weakness leaving the body, just throwing that one in as a freebie!

Now this is the commandments of the new cult:

H - Happiness gene, not much there, you got it
or you don't
A - Alturism - good deeds, voulenteer work
P - Have a purpose in your life, develop goals
P - Work to keep a positive attitude
I - Intimate Relationships, don't shut yourself off
from people
N - Never retire, even when you retire from work
stay active at home working and being
creative
E - Exercise, we knew that one
S - Spiritual Life - we may have trouble with this
one with some here but no one follows any
religion perfectly anyway. :)
S - SMILE :) Just the act of smiling releases
dopamine, adrenaline, and seritonian!
Maybe this is why I am the goddess, I smile
all the time in my physical life and I guess on
the net as well, could you tell!! :) :)

OK kids, start propagating! :) And SMILE!
I know I am playing here but this really was on the news and made a lot of sense to me. Hope it helps some.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:14:27 (EDT)
From: Helen
Email: None
To: The Goddess
Subject: Robynitarianism
Message:
O great Goddess
Thank you for this satsang today
It has brightened my day
When do you dance for us?
(belly dance)
Dance dance dance
Our hearts want to see you dance
(:
How is Fable? I sent an email to you and it bounced--is your hotmail ok?. My mother in law had her hip replacement yesterday, she is doing fine!! Alleluia!! We are taking care of her 14 year old pug dog, it is a doggie hotel here!
Love
Helen
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:28:17 (EDT)
From: Robyn
Email: sundogs@hotmail.com
To: Helen
Subject: Robynitarianism
Message:
Dear Helen,
I know I wrote the post in humor but really thought it had a lot of important stuff to say.
Try to send the email again if you still have it. Hotmail basically sucks!
Fable is fine. She did much better than the vet thought she would so I am happy!
Love you,
Robyn
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 17:30:27 (EDT)
From: Gail
Email: None
To: Robyn
Subject: Robyn'UsBlind would be a
Message:
better handle. We could implant small chips into each person's brain. That way, the members are only keystroke away. Did you see 'Disturbing Behaviour.'
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 18:19:19 (EDT)
From: Robyn
Email: sundogs@hotmail.com
To: Gail
Subject: Robyn'UsBlind would be a
Message:
Dear Gail,
The possiblities are really endless, eh? :)
No, I didn't see or ever hear of, for that matter, 'Disturbing Behaviour.' Is it a movie? I use to have a friend who kept me up to date on movies but haven't heard from him in a while. :)
Love,
Robyn
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 17:24:13 (EDT)
From: Gail
Email: None
To: Robyn
Subject: Robyn'UsBlind = RUB + Rubbies
Message:
Of course, the organization Robyn'UsBlind could be shortened to RUB. The folowers could be called RUBBIES. This is very similar to DLM. 'Maharaji is the prem. We are the premies (lovers).' Durga Ji, 1978
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 22:27:58 (EDT)
From: Robyn
Email: sundogs@hotmail.com
To: Gail
Subject: Robyn'UsBlind = RUB + Rubbies
Message:
Dear Gail,
I LOVE it, RUB and Rubbies, just to funny, with the basis as happiness and dance. Please lets not make it a carbon copy of BM's cult though. It could be good but the most basic thing should be NO institutionalization. That may be impossible but I'd have to try. I think most good ideas that are brought to fruition then have the danger of becoming static. This should be a living, breathing thing. I know we are just playing but I threw a bit of my real philosophy in, as another freebie!
Also Rubbies/Tubbies, Tele Tubbies... maybe Rebel Rubbies. ;)
Love,
Robyn
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 15:50:46 (EDT)
From: Gail
Email: None
To: The Goddess-Robyn
Subject: Ya gotta love it!
Message:
These suggestions are wonderful! I shall print them out and put them on the fridge. I may not follow them though. It looks like another tall order.

G - Gee,
U - You
R - Are
U - You

It took me 25 years to find out what Guru meant--recreate your own boundaries. We are not one.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 18:27:57 (EDT)
From: cp
Email: None
To: Gail
Subject: Ya gotta love it!
Message:
So where do we send the grocery money, the rent, and will there be houses to communally live so we can save more in order to give??
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 00:27:57 (EDT)
From: Victoria
Email: None
To: cp
Subject: good point! (nt)
Message:
good point!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 17:44:35 (EDT)
From: Mike
Email: None
To: Gail
Subject: Some cultic ideas
Message:
Hey Gail: I've got some ideas for your new cult.

1. You're in charge. Sorry, but to be a full fledged cult, there must be one person that is the repository of all knowledge and authority. So, at this point you should be telling me to sit down and shut-up because you don't need any advice on how to start a cult....:-)

2. The basic belief is that god resides on the tops of mountains (where the prana is the strongest...EVERYONE just KNOWS that!) not in polluted cities or shallow drainage ditches.

3. Your motto should be: If you like it, take a hike (to the top of a mountain, of course!). If you don't like it, just go watch some TV! (This really helps, because you already have a name for your EX's: Couch Potatos).

4. Your explanation of creation: The universe was created by a gasious turtle, who cut the cheese and poof (no pun intended). Now, the universe rides on the back of said turtle. (This belief is a requirement because you must keep true to your hindu radio-salami tradition.)

5. Your promises: You will see to it that there is a mountaintop in every country in the world (where people can meet god), which you will personally own and can be used by all of your 'hikers' for a modest fee, of course (to assist you in buying other mountain tops).

6. Your personal needs: A small hovel (no more than 120 gold-laden bedrooms) to be used, obviously, as a contact point for the low-landers that are to be recruited. Of course, since the low-landers will soon be 'hikers,' they can be encouraged to give you there worthless lowland properties as they move to the 'high' lands!

That's just a start, but I think it has the basics in it. :-)
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 17:47:59 (EDT)
From: Mike
Email: None
To: Mike
Subject: I FORGOT ONE THING!
Message:
Gail: This is REALLY important.

7. Why YOUR PATH: Since people have 'hiked' for centuries, it can be easy seen that YOUR PATH is the most NATURAL and OBVIOUSLY CORRECT! Also, people have always wanted to be 'ON TOP,' so once again, incontrovertable proof that YOUR PATH is the most natural and correct.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 22:32:59 (EDT)
From: Robyn
Email: sundogs@hotmail.com
To: Mike
Subject: I FORGOT ONE THING!
Message:
Dear Mike,
Sounds like you've been planning this for awhile! :) You've already been to the top of that mountain haven't you. :)
Love,
Robyn
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 11:32:39 (EDT)
From: Mike
Email: None
To: Robyn
Subject: I FORGOT ONE THING!
Message:
Robyn: Dammmmm.... You aren't supposed to have noticed that. I was hoping to me her first 'mahiker.' You know, the guy that 'reveals' the mountains and 'gives' them as gifts to the people that already own them....then expects some 'gratitude' in return. You know.... :-)
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, May 28, 1999 at 07:31:54 (EDT)
From: Robyn
Email: sundogs@hotmail.com
To: Mike
Subject: I FORGOT ONE THING!
Message:
Dear Mike,
What special insights and a cut in the profits!? :)
Love,
Robyn
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 16:21:31 (EDT)
From: YOUR GOOROO
Email: Infinity.org
To: Everyone
Subject: My own words!
Message:
TO MY PREMIES: I've heard an awful lot of rumors about how all the premies are misquoting me on a regular basis and then I get blamed for it! I'm tired of this and want to set the record straight.

Look, I'm gonna tell you premies this stuff, one LAST TIME! Read it, memorize it and repeat it on-cue:

THAT LOVE is like....well, it's like my ever-unfolding rolls of bulbous lard, it just goes on and on.

THAT PEACE is like ....is like, uh, what I feel when I've slipped the surly bonds of earth in my personal smog-belching airliner-for-two, which the premies were so anxious to buy for me.

THAT JOY is just like THAT FEELING that I feel everytime I look around MY house and realize that it is all mine, Mine, MINE!

Now, go away and leave me alone..... Satsang takes soooo much out of me. Who says that I don't work? Maybe it's time to let you numbskulls bang your cranial cavities into my feet again; god knows you don't know how to use them for anything else.

Blessings to all the numbsk....I mean premies
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 20:19:09 (EDT)
From: dv
Email: None
To: YOUR GOOROO
Subject: Echostar
Message:
Speaking of m's words- his speeches will be available ppv style via Echostar satellite systems. One drawback for m- he will have to watch what he says, as his live talks won't be edited.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 15:53:42 (EDT)
From: Gail
Email: None
To: dv
Subject: Echostar
Message:
Could you find out how we can access Echostar for our own personal broadcast at home. Perhaps we can pay echostar instead of Guru Margarine.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 01:36:26 (EDT)
From: KB
Email: None
To: Everyone
Subject: A friend in need.
Message:
I ask the forum regulars to read the post by 'I Wish'
in the programming thread by Gail.
She is our friend and sometimes posts need responding to.
Doesn't have to be everybody, but...
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 07:26:20 (EDT)
From: Robyn
Email: sundogs@hotmail.com
To: KB
Subject: I Wish and Rob
Message:
Dear I Wish,
I am so sorry for what happened to you. I have experienced that terror myself, not within the cult wihich probably made it even worse and especially if you were a child. I hope you have told people close to you and that they are supportive of you. My heart goes out to you.
Love,
Robyn

Dear Rob,
I first saw you post in the thread with RT's wonderful song, he is great isn't he. You said you weren't an ex but that you loved his song. Then I read your reply to I Wish...I didn't continue reading and I hope to god that you changed your tone with I Wish as the post I read was cruel and callous. I would suggest that you assume someone is telling the truth, especially considering the subject of the post, untill or unless you find that it indeed a joke. Being a man does not mean that you can not be compassionate. Many women have experienced this horror I know all these years later I still have not but scratched the surface of the ways in which the experiences damaged me, more than being in this cult ever did.
If you wondered if it was a joke you could have asked instead of being cruel. I saw a nice side of you in the other thread and I hope to see that side of you come out again in support of I Wish.
Love,
Robyn
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 18:03:52 (EDT)
From: Rob
Email: None
To: Robyn
Subject: I Wish and Rob
Message:
Dear Robyn,

I did make an ass of myself totally there, and apologised later in the same thread. I was caught off guard a little because I was in the midst of a robust discussion with Jim and assumed (wrongly) that he had thrown on a mask to emphasise his point. I do have a wicked sense of humour, but I also know that it was totally inappropriate in that case, so again, I would like to sincerely apologise to 'I Wish' and anyone else who was offended by that posting.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 18:55:39 (EDT)
From: Robyn
Email: sundogs@hotmail.com
To: Rob
Subject: I Wish and Rob
Message:
Dear Rob,
Thanks, you seemed so nice in the first post I read from you, glad you seem so still. I hope 'I Wish' felt better when she read your apology. Lots of folks here do 'put on' other identities and sometimes it makes my head spin. Of course that isn't so hard to do. :)
Love,
Robyn
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 14:40:45 (EDT)
From: Katie
Email: mishkat@gateway.net
To: I wish, and all
Subject: To 'I Wish'
Message:
Dear 'I Wish' -
You wrote:

I wish you men would shut up.

I wish you could experience the shock, the helplessness, the feeling of falling, falling, falling into the darkest corner of one's being to block the horror.

I wish you could look into the abysmal darkness of his eyes as he placed his hands, his mouth on my body.

Nowhere to run, nowhere to hide. Paralyzed by fear and confusion. I wish you could go to that place for one moment.

I wish you were brave enough to defend me.

I wish you weren't so stoned back then be it drugs or M.
You might have noticed but you probably wouldn't care. Would you?

It didn't matter then to you.

It doesn't matter now either.

I wish you men would shut up.
I wish you men would shut up.

I wish you the terror.
I wish your guru the terror.

I wish my innocence was not stolen.

I wish....


Your message sounded like a cry for help. I'm so sorry that this happened to you, 'I wish'. I don't know if it will help, but many of us have been through similar experiences, if not with mahatmas, then with other men (rape, incest, sexual abuse by family members, and so forth). And there are MEN here who have been through the same thing too, or who have had sisters/daughters/mothers/friends who have been through it, and who can understand how you feel. So many of us, both women and men, CAN understand how you feel.

I hope you have talked to someone about what happened to you. I know it's very hard to do that, but it is NOT your fault that these things happened to you. Please keep posting here, or feel free to e-mail me or anyone else you feel comfortable with here. I am very concerned about you.

Love,
Katie
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:40:29 (EDT)
From: Victoria
Email: None
To: I Wish
Subject: To 'I Wish'
Message:
Dear I Wish,

Keep writing, your writing is like poetry and writing will help you release the feelings, the terror. Well, it helped me anyway. I hope you have someone to talk with, talking about it helps, also.

You may not want to write about it on the forum, since I have noticed that many of the premies who post here are very cruel to exes who reveal their private lives. I could not believe how cruel they were to Gail when she wrote about her therapy. But Gail is so strong, I don't think they can hurt her. G's mom has been very brave here, also, and they have mistreated her for coming forward.

E-mail me if you want, vico87@aol.com

Love,
Victoria
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 17:50:33 (EDT)
From: Angry
Email: None
To: Everyone
Subject: help
Message:
Hi
I just heard about this forum and I am quite blown away by what I have so far read.
It's good to know that I am not the only one who feels like I do.
I have been together with a premie for nearly 4 and a half years
and at the beginning he seemed like the perfect guy. I started to
watch M Videos and quite enjoyed them. So I became an Aspirant and
went to a couple of programmes and recieved K about a couple of
years ago. I started to practise etc. etc. and at a certain point in time the whole idea about living from your heart and what was
actually happening in my partnership sarted not to gell at all.
So, I am at the near point of despair about this loved one in my
life. He's now out there spreading the message and I am left in the cold. Simply, I am also very angry, hurt and well simply pissed off. Life for me has more option than putting some person up and above everybody else. I just see the actuall humanness going down the drain.
My partner is also believing that M is the reincarnated Bodhisatva. Basically he's the Idol and God of his, untouchable.
The fact is the he himself comes straight after M.!!!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 17:57:13 (EDT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: Angry
Subject: help
Message:
Maybe you should have tried harder. Did you really try to live from your heart? Was your mind constantly getting in the way? Why didn't you get a lobotamy then, if you were so damned sincere? Good premies had their brains defused years ago. You sound like a real fence-sitter, Angry. I have no doubt that if you'd joined another cult you'd be bitching about that one too.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 18:12:39 (EDT)
From: Gail
Email: freedom@gtn.net
To: Angry
Subject: help
Message:
I will assume your post is genuine. I can really empathize. Most premies are not known for their long-term relationships. Everything is temporary except the Guru.

My advice to you is to stick around and get rid of the brain- washing you have been subjected to. If your partner has been involved for a long time, he may never come away. It may well be that you need a new partner. It sounds like you've broken up anyway. Lo and behold. In your deepest, darkest hour, Guru Margarine is not there. This site will help. I hope you have friends and family outside the cult.

Look on the bright side. Luckily, you missed the days when he was the Lord of the Universe. If you need to talk to someone, e-mail me (I won't reveal who you are), and I can a) phone you or e-mail you as you like. We can be angry together!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 18:32:22 (EDT)
From: Happy
Email: None
To: Angry
Subject: help
Message:
I symphatize with you. I was myself stuck with a wife who was absolutely nuts about M. She told our kids that M meant more to her than they did...

First, we were both premies. Then, I got my doubts and was a fence-sitter for years. Tried to make our marriage last. It didn't! We were married 15 years. I'm sorry, I think your relationship has a poor prognosis... Tell him, it's gotta be you or the phony, fake, fraudulent guru. Good luck!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 18:43:10 (EDT)
From: Rob
Email: None
To: Angry
Subject: help
Message:
Sounds like your partner's off his rocker. Who's Bodhisatva? Was he espousing these beliefs when you first met him, before you received Knowledge, or only recently?

Sounds a wee bit bogus, actually.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 18:48:25 (EDT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: Rob
Subject: help
Message:
Bhodidodi's just a bhuddist way of saying avatar. I don't think there's anything bogus here at all. Lots of premies think of Maharaji that way. After all, he said so himself.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 18:59:16 (EDT)
From: Rob
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: Bhodacious bhuddies
Message:
Wouldn't life be dull without all these foreign words to spice up our conversations?

I flunked comparitive religion at college, and generally only hung out with premies who talked about beer, football and sex, so I must profess ignorance on the matter. Apologies if I've hastily judged.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 19:45:50 (EDT)
From: Diz
Email: None
To: Angry
Subject: help
Message:
Hi Angry

I'm assuming your post is genuine and Jim's is a joke. You've probably gathered he isn't exactly a premie.

No, you aren't alone. There have been quite a few posts from people who are finding their relationship with a premie isn't quite so perfect as it initially seemed.

I don't have solutions either. Some people are so locked into MJ that they don't have time for being human. Others do seem to manage both. Personally, I'd be VERY cautious of getting involved with anyone who was deeply into a guru, or any belief structure which didn't celebrate human feelings and down-to-earth stuff like relationships, children, community (the one that includes people other than group members).

Mj has always said - or at least did till I left 5 years ago - that he and K should be a premie's first priority. For some, that translates into the kind of behaviour and attitudes you've described. I don't necessarily blame your partner: MJ's words can very easily be taken this way.

Good luck, Angry. I too hope you have non-premies around you. You'll get some support here if you want it. I suspect that the kinds of questions you're raising won't go down too well with a fair few premies, because they imply that MJ's world can produce less-than-wonderful results. They may be prepared to bag your partner, but not to explore the wider context which informs him.

Hope that makes some sense.

Best wishes

Diz
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 20:17:59 (EDT)
From: Cheer up
Email: None
To: Diz
Subject: RT's Song-to make you laugh
Message:
The Bored of The Yuga verse. - by R.T.

Read this to the tune of the 1960's TV theme song, The Beverly Hillbillies.

Realize my mad song of Loud Balyogeshwar
Who marketed devotees to travel wide and far
He shouted 'Take this Knowledge - I reveal peace for free'
(And Buy the Way: A Lifetime's Devotion give to me.)
Royal, that is. Krishna Gold. Rawat Glee.

Well, I heard about the Mission in my 2nd year in school
My peers' said 'Truth is free - man, don't be a fool!'
They said 'Kali Yuga is the age you want to flee'
So I vacuumed floor of Ashram to be a new Premie.
Toil, that is. All Weak. SWAT-sang.

This Knowledge was the cure for any karmic scar -
Dogma? Amnesia? Remember Who You Are!
Mahatmas said: Want Bliss? Prostrate to Shri Sant Ji.
My forehead's on the rug, I'm allergic to Bhakti!
Yoga, that is. Baragons. Wave candle.

I wanted more, in '74, I heard of 'IHQ'
DLM building where they live for Satguru
I volunteer for charity, but World Peace tempted me:
To hell with UNICEF, moved West at age 20.
Denver, that is. Fool's gold. Premie Ji.

Six years on, the Mecca is: Miami. Get a tan.
Go swimming after Serve-Us? Holy Name, Atman!
We drove all night from Denver, drinking black coffee,
Maharaji's playing Holi? You need optics to see.
Babies, we is. In tents, cold. Kissimmee.

Serve-Us! On his Aircraft! To His hanger towed...
Secret business DECA, where Premies spoke in code
'41' meant Darshan, '9' was Beans tonite -
Undernourished Slaves. It's Plane this isn't right.
Broke, that is. Poverty. Sleep in Car.

Common senses shook me, God, please help me mend.
This Mission drilled me softly. Brainwashed by my 'friends.'
I went back to my home state to get B.A. degree,
My salary shot up 10 grand; peace with family.
Confidence, that is. OK to think. Blind, see?

Then, Programs were recorded, which Visions sent to town.
Selected Premies shlepped the tapes and tubes around
Hours spent in community rooms at Library -
All the driving effort; few Aspirants you see.
Cult, it is. Same old faces. Ask Them Why?

What did I experience? Emotions (He can speak)
Occasionally remembered heart bliss (when I seek)
The 4 techniques? I feel good, but it's inside of me -
Meditation Teacher: with Personality.
One of 30, that is. Hindu trip: Buys a car.

What will I miss most? Travel and the fun
of Being - on the Ocean of Illusion (in the Sun)
'Going Inside' at big convention halls is hard -
So are the monthly payments of my Visa credit card.
16% that is. 3 grand. Still I pay.

Lots of tapes and photos, see how the Fat Guru!
Discourse for Dedication, Repetition made it True....
But after 24 years, It's clear this Guru's boat -
is circling his Residence. That 'Ocean'... is a Moat!
Chit-wreaked, that is. Now Kabir this: No Arti.

PS: On May 2 I found this 'Ex - Premies' web page...
Learned of other Journeys, and your tips were sage.
Sent copies to Maharaji, Visions and Elan -
On May 12, India exploded Non-Peace Bombs!
Peace - where is? Satsang Told. Divine might?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index


Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 20:31:07 (EDT)
From: Rob
Email: None
To: RT?
Subject: RT's Song-to make you laugh
Message:
You've clearly missed your calling, unless, that is, you do write comedy.

I know I shouldn't, not being an 'x', but I laughed my ass off. Why not record it and stream it to the EverSound web site?

LOL

Rob
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 20:43:34 (EDT)
From: The Comedian
Email: None
To: Rob
Subject: RT writes Adam Sandler's next
Message:
movie, 'THE CULT BOY.'
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 20:51:10 (EDT)
From: Rob
Email: None
To: The Comedian
Subject: RT writes Adam Sandler's next
Message:
Would that be a sequel to the (holy) waterboy?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 22:35:00 (EDT)
From: RT
Email: omm
To: Rob
Subject: RT writes movies?
Message:
OK! ..soon is Chapter 2: Prachar Wars. The Rant-om Menace.

Thanks for the vote, I do it for fun, never thought of getting paid...jeez, I am at a for words.

...glad you in joyed. It helped me laugh off the 24 years involvement as I take partial responsibility for going along for so long, so Maharaji, so long! You fooled a lot of people some of the time, but no more.

RT
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 22:42:23 (EDT)
From: Gail
Email: None
To: RT
Subject: RT writes movies?
Message:
Glad you didn't mind my transferring over your poem? You would make a great comedy writer. When you have time, why not put your other songs on line again. You have a way with words.

Luv,

The comedian
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 22:46:33 (EDT)
From: Rob
Email: None
To: Gail
Subject: RT writes movies?
Message:
I think he has retired for the night - last seen at the end of the final thread.

Think I'll do likewise, it's been a pleasure sharing with you all.

Rob
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 01:22:10 (EDT)
From: Still angry
Email: None
To: Rob
Subject: RT writes movies?
Message:
Hi everyone. I just walked around the corner again to see my friend who has got the box. This is the first time I am on to
the internet. So I am blown away whats possible!! Anyway I am not
a con or something I am defenitly very frustrated!! How on earth dit it take me that long to realise what it can do to a person to
be linked up to a cult. Let alone what it has been doing to me and
the children involved. I wish I would have a box at home so I could realy get into it. Thank's everyone - I will be on to this
as soon as I can again. Is there such a recipie like: save the lost premi - how to? Has this forum got an organisation to send out infos to premies how to un-brainwash yourself back to being a 'normal', practical, down to earth human being. Actually the whole
thing is quite spookey what it can do to people.
Who will mop up the mess?
I would love to go on but I actualy have to go home now and feed
the children. So how is that.
I am sure Jim will have a few juicy comments about my few lines here and I look forward to hearing more from everyone.
Hi Gail, I'll get in touch.
Thank's for the song Rob and so on, so on. I will be getting used
to this box and how to get confident to express my bits and pieces with it. Also english is not my mother tongue but so what.
Bye for now!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 01:42:11 (EDT)
From: Roger E. Drek
Email: None
To: RT
Subject: soon to be ***Best*** (nt)
Message:
asdf
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 16:11:11 (EDT)
From: Zac
Email: None
To: Cheer up
Subject: Made my day, Thanks nt
Message:
Guess the brain still works; great song. I could see granny sitting in her rocking chair.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 20:38:08 (EDT)
From: Diz
Email: None
To: Cheer up
Subject: RT's Song-to make you laugh
Message:
Dear Gail, RT, Angry

Thanks for that. I really need something to laugh about right now. RT, you are amazing! I loved your film-script, too.

Hang in there, Angry. Will look forward to hearing more from you. I don't think there's any instant premie-deprogramming kits, unfortunately, well not for premies who aren't interested in getting out. For those that are...like you?... there's a heap of suggestions running around on this site.

Diz
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 14:50:09 (EDT)
From: Marianne
Email: None
To: Cheer up
Subject: RT's Song-to make you laugh
Message:
Cheer Up: Raucous, absolutely raucous! And to Angry: Please keep reading the site. You will learn more and more about we ex's and about the infamous history of the cult. Premies sometimes use k and their involvement with M. to depersonalize their relationships. All focus is on M, to the detriment of those around the premie who should have places of importance in the premie's life. I know this because I did it and had it done to me by a premie I was in love with. For some premies, emotional instabilities get created or intensified by their involvement with M. If you're wondering if you did something to cause this sudden change, you did not. Your partner has changed. I urge you to spend time with non-premies who can reassure you about your insights. Good luck.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 17:50:24 (EDT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: Everyone
Subject: my ethics (way OT, sorry)
Message:
To summarize, I agree with you that chldren are not negotiable.

My mention of Maharaji and the others was in reference to the conversation here. I have no inside information. It was more like a 'what if'.

But Mary, if children are not negotiable, what about the ones who
might have to face Jim in a court of law whose job it might be to defend someone he strongly feels is guilty of the same crime?
What about those children?


Whatever.....

GI, you strike me as someone who's just never really had to think through these issues in a practical way. I mean, we coul do it. Let's put you in charge. Your criminal justice system. What would you change?

Only specifics, please! I really don't want to hear any self-righteous generalities. Forget them before you answer and just tell me what practical, concrete changes you'd make to the system and why? In particular, how would you change the role of defense lawyers?

Anyone can pontificate. If you have some real improvements to suggest -- again, concrete, practical ideas only -- let's hear them. Maybe you've got something to offer. Maybe you don't.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 22:56:53 (EDT)
From: GI
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: my ethics (way OT, sorry)
Message:
Dear Jim,

I know the old adage, 'he who asks the questions controls the conversation' as well or better than you. I asked you 2 questions. The same 2 that Shp asked you. And I deduced from your own input that you either have already, or could at any time, be faced with the task of getting someone off who you know is guilty, and be proud of it. And that person could be a pedophile. Please do not try to deflect my questions with a philsophical wrestling match over the pros and cons of the legal system. I was born at 6:00am but not yesterday at 6:00 am.

This is not about the legal system. The legal system does not post here. You do. You put up such a big pile of bravado that I'd wager most people don't want to mess with you, even if they'd like to tell you something. I admire people who shape their lives and careers based on their principles. I just don't see how you can reconcile how you would treat a pedophile client versus how you treat a pedophile here.

And this is not (OT) as you put it. Talk is cheap. Who we are is what we do, what we put out. You know a tree by its fruits.
So put your money where your mouth is, and we'll all be the better for it.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, May 23, 1999 at 23:15:22 (EDT)
From: GI
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: my ethics (way OT, sorry)
Message:
Dear Jim,

Two more points nag at me to post before I retire for the night:

A) Your need to require me to do your maze before you answer me.

B) Your 'zombiefied' denial of your own moral responsibility and accountability in the mistakes the legal system makes. You speak like the CEO of a corporation that breaks laws and then is immune from the law because of some ink on paper. Native Americans know alot about that. With the stroke of a pen, they lost their land in many places.

Sometimes, my fellow man, you can't change the system. You just have to walk away and find a new game that is more in line with who you really are and what you believe in. Walking away from such a scene is not weakness, it is wisdom.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 00:23:55 (EDT)
From: KB
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: US Indian facts-not fantasy
Message:
As a part native american (cherokee),
I have to say that indians have a ghastly past and not the
romantic notions many have.
They were completely vulnerable to human nature just like
anyone else and most died from DISEASE. About 90%.
The most terrible torture stories I know are Indian stories
and to quote a chief from over 100 years ago,
(roughly), 'The women and the old men try to talk to the young men
but the young men are caught in revenge and thier cruelty knows
no bounds.'--(that's a very close quote).

The revenge he is referring to is the constant wars between
indians (and anyone else), and in Connecticut, usa, there is
a tribe called the Pequots, translation--man eaters--, and
in 1640 they attacked a small group of english farmers
in Wethersfield conn. and killed women and children and when
they were attacked by the settlers later, 17 pequot men
went to a tribe in Massachusetts for assistance and they were
buried up to thier necks alive and left-by thier divine
indian brothers.

The romantic notions people have of indians is a fantasy,
and as a direct partial descendent, I state it for the record.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 02:41:49 (EDT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: Ha ha, you lose
Message:
Well, well, besides a lot of sophomoric bluster you've really got no answers, do you? Not a single practical suggestion. How miserably predictable.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 08:26:31 (EDT)
From: GI
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: Nothing lost but your soul
Message:
Dear Jim,

I have lost nothing but the time I have wasted dealing with you.
And even that was not totally lost, for I have learned something about you, so the time was well spent.

Here's how our interaction has gone down:

1) I asked you some questions after a brief dialog.
2) You responded with a demand for answers of your own about my read of the legal system and how it should be changed.
3) I asked you again to respond to my questions without any hoops for me to jump through first.
4) You come back with your last post.

Anybody who can't see what you are doing is either very dense or has been mesmerized by your brains, bullshit and brashness. Or is afraid to speak up.

When you are shaving or brushing your teeth and you have to look into your own eyes in the mirror and know that any day you could be called upon to defend someone you believe is a child molestor, that's good enough for me. My ego does not require me to pin you here and make you cry 'uncle'. In your present state, you never will. I knew that from the beginning. Your antics now are no surprise.

I can see you at happy hour at your favorite watering hole on that fateful day. I can see you bragging how you got somebody else off
and inside you pray to God your instincts were wrong, for everything inside you screamed at you for saving a pedophile from incarceration.

As for the Native Americans and their problems, KB's flailing rebuttal and your hedging, silly response, what can one say to arrogance, ignorance and enough pride to fill a very large area?
Not much. KB's factoids are not new information. They had no bearing on what I brought up about other situations where tribes lost land with the stroke of a pen.

When you shake a cold clammy hand that is attached to a future client who is up on pedophile charges, and everything in you says he's dirty, that'll be enough for me. And very well could happen if it hasn't already. I hope it happens soon, so you can feel it yourself.

You have agreed to play a game in your profession that makes people pawns, their lives, pain and suffering negotiable, and your own God-given abilities to see and recognize truth for what it is bound and gagged inside you, as you meanwhile may one day unleash all your awesome legal brainpower on a child to create doubt about your client, who your own self is crying out to you that he's dirty as they come. Tough spot. No wonder you explode when you get here. No response necessary or requested. you have no more credibility with me, so save your mental powers for court. You are going to need them.

So you didn't give up your power to reason for yourself to Maharaji. You gave it up to the legal profession. I don't see a difference. Once again, no response necessary for me. I wouldn't believe you anymore after this little trip you took me on anyway.
But I am sure you'll want to post something just to attempt to save face. Go ahead.

Over and out.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 10:27:02 (EDT)
From: Mike
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: So are you saying
Message:
GI: Are you saying that people that are guilty deserve NO defense? Huh....is THAT what you are saying? Well, let's hope, for your sake, that you are never falsely accused of something and that defense attorneys refuse to take your case because they believe you are guilty...... Are you THAT stupid?

Whether ANY defense attorney knows their client is guilty or not is NOT THE POINT! They would be remiss in their DUTY (a word that you don't seem to understand) if they did not take a case based upon their own personal bias (pro or con).

Additionally, unless you are native american, stop using them as your whipping boy. I AM native and I find such posts demeaning in the extreme coming from pontificating people like yourself. YOU obviously KNOW NOTHING of native american history or lore (thank you KB.... lakota here).
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 10:46:03 (EDT)
From: GI
Email: None
To: Mike
Subject: So are you saying
Message:
Dear Mike,

If you go back in history, most every cultural group has been on both the receiving and the giving side of oppression. Don't tell me I have to have Native American blood to know what oppression is all about. Jim uses the legal system and you use your heritage to
build some case of exclusivity. House of cards.

Furthermore, I understand the legal system as it is now and why it is the way it is. What is in question is Jim's participation in it and his diametrically opposing viewpoints on how he would treat a pedophile who might happen to be his client. If his own conscience was witness to the person's all-out guilt, or at least a very strong suspicion, then Jim does not have to take the case, but he would anyway. Is that money-driven? Is that driven by the wish to propgate a flawed system?

What I am pointing out here in the broad daylight of this public forum is that Jim's job contradicts his professed values here.
Would a vegetarian with strong feelings about not killing animals be a butcher? Would a pacifist who doesn't believe in violence
or guns apply for work as an armed guard or law enforcement officer? Would someone who openly detests pedophiles and injustice willingly and enthusiastically defend someone who he truly believed in his heart was guilty, in the name of the system? And be proud of it?

As for rennovating the system, it definitely needs it and I have my ideas. But that is not the issue here. And as for giving my answers about it to Jim, I will say to him and you all the same thing Jim said to Shp: you answer me first. then maybe I'll give you the same respect. Two-way street, or no thruway at all.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 11:10:38 (EDT)
From: Mike
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: It is EXCLUSIVE
Message:
GI: Due to the fact that all you know about native americans, you learned from books written 'about' these peoples and the simple fact that those stylized histories have changed from generation to generation means that you don't know anything. YES, I do have some exclusivity here. In other words, your experience comes from reading, not doing/being. The building of a sweat-lodge and wearing of beads/feathers does NOT help you to understand the thoughts and feelings of these people. The history of native americans cannot be learned from books, it must be learned from the people themselves (most of whom will have nothing to do with history books written for YOU because they are not interested in YOU or what YOU think of them). So, tell me, how many sun ceremonies have you attended? Do you even know what it is? Do you know what it is used for? Do you know its legal status? Do you know why it has that legal status? Without understanding these simple questions, you CANNOT POSSIBLY understand ANYTHING about lakota (answers: you don't, you have no idea, nope, 'illegal' in the US and no, again). To which 'oppression' are you referring? Which is the most important?

Let's change the track here a bit to make it a little less personal, would you say that you really understand the oppression of blacks in america and aboriginal peoples in australia? 'I' wouldn't!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 15:59:55 (EDT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: Mike
Subject: You're lying, GI
Message:
As I read this thread again -- while having a quick bite before running out to the jail to see a client -- I'm particularly pissed off by your deceit. Comparing me to Shp you refuse to answer my questions until I've answered yours. I've answered them!

Now it's your turn. You already alluded to both your understanding of the justice system and your opinion that it's 'flawed'. Tell me, GI, how you would change the role of defense counsel? And you beter be specific or you're really going to look dumb after all this.

By the way, if Maharaji's ever indicted for fraud -- say in some country that might allow for it, that doesn't have the same generous protection of just about anything with the word 'religion' stamped on it -- would you endorse some defense for him? I mean the record's clear. There is absolutely no question but that he masqueraded as the Lord of the Universe. (Here's a reminder:

1)Who is Guru? The highest manifestation of God is Guru. So when Guru is here, God is here, to whom will you give your devotion?

2)Guru Maharj Ji knows all. Guru Maharaji is Brahma (creator). Guru Maharaji is Vishnu (Operator). Guru Maharjai is Shiva (Destoryer of illusion and ego). And above all, Guru Mahraji is the Supremest Lord in person before us.

3)I have come so powerful. I have come for the world. Whenever the great come,the worldly oppose them. Again I have come and you are not listening. Every ear should hear that the saviour of humanity has come. There should be no chance for anyone to say that they haven't heard of Guru Maharaj Ji. Those who have come to me are already saved. Now its your duty to save others. Shout it on the streets. Why be shy?)

What would you think of his lawyer who tried to refute the allegation that he did as much?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 05:12:07 (EDT)
From: nigel
Email: nigel@redcrow.demon.co.uk
To: GI
Subject: So are you saying
Message:
You are ignoring Mike's point - which highlights perfectly the weakness of your own: if every lawyer with principles were to 'walk away' from the system, rather than defend a client who might be guilty (and remember, every suspect is innocent until proven otherwise), then the inevitable outcome would be a legal system populated by people without principles. The price of guaranteeing legal rights to the innocent is to offer equal rights to the guilty.

Your orginal question to Jim is simply bizarre, IMO.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 08:07:03 (EDT)
From: GI
Email: None
To: nigel
Subject: So are you saying
Message:
Dear Nigel,

Walking away is not a solution. Getting proactive with one's own craft and working on improving it is.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 11:29:50 (EDT)
From: Once Guilty and Setup
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: Shiny happy people
Message:
GI,

You're such a naive idealist. Time to grow up and get real.

I was arrested once. I was sort of guilty, but technically, it was entrapment. The police report in no way accurately portrayed what really happenend where bascially they lied. First, I didn't know that the gun was loaded. Second, I was just giving this guy a ride to the 7-11.

However, the reality was that it was easier and better for me to get a deferred prosecution, pay the fine, and do the time.

You know, I'll never forget what it feels like to be in police custody. All of a sudden you've got absolutely no control of your life. Once you're inside the bowels of the system the police treat you like total shit. It's really a place that you don't want to go. Hey, look at that New York City deal with the sodomy of the Jamaican and that's in the U.S.A.

To have lawyers scrutinize the system from the top down is a damn good thing, fool! A police state is a very ugly thing.

Maybe you should get a little experience of life before you become an armchair expert on everything. It would probably doing you some good.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 16:24:59 (EDT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: Yeah, I knew it
Message:
Walking away is not a solution. Getting proactive with one's own craft and working on improving it is.

I told you, practical. This kind of pompous drivel is worthless, no worse, it actually makes you think you're saying something.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 17:11:08 (EDT)
From: Mike
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: Did you actually expect
Message:
Jim: an answer with real substance? Drivel is all this guy knows. Remember, he's got the prefect drivel-master in his heart. Since he was so interested in the oppression of native peoples (yeah, right....), I'd like to know how he would fix it!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 08:10:53 (EDT)
From: nigel
Email: nigel@redcrow.demon.co.uk
To: GI
Subject: So are you saying
Message:
GI,

You wrote:

Walking away is not a solution. Getting proactive with one's own craft and working on improving it is.

I suspect you know even less about the way Jim goes about his job than I do. You seem to be making assumptions here.

In a lower post, you also hinted at being 'persecuted' on the forum. You sound a little paranoid. For my own part I would have given you exactly the same response if you were a regular forum 'ex' - just as I've had fairly serious disagreements with many of the others here on all sorts of subjects including scientific, political and paranomal questions. Not every difference of opinion with a premie is a personal attack on Prem Rawat - or even on that premie. Usually it is just about discussing the matters raised (though premies rarely stick around to discuss anything).

And I still don't understand your original point. I have re-read your posts and you seem very clearly to be saying that to defend a pedophile is unethical. And before going on to say that you don't want to discuss the legal system, you should perhaps consider who raised the subject in the first place.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 08:15:40 (EDT)
From: GI
Email: None
To: nigel
Subject: So are you saying
Message:
Dear Nigel,

'you seem very clearly to be saying that to defend a pedophile is unethical.'

I am asking Jim for his personal feedback, not a subscription to Litigation Quarterly.

The persecution is from past experience, not referring to treatment here.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 11:29:11 (EDT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: Be fair, GI
Message:
I am asking Jim for his personal feedback, not a subscription to Litigation Quarterly.

You're doing much more than that. Yes, you're asking for my opinion. In fact, I answered you more than once now. You then have tried to pillory my character by saying that what I do is extremely unethical. The fact is, asshole, the onus is on you to explain why. Can't you see that? And that raises all the questions here that you're trying to avoid.

If this is a reflection of your ethics, I'd say you've got a few things to learn yourself.

Now, again, GI, what'll it be? Put up or shut up?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 15:21:52 (EDT)
From: GI
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: Be fair, GI
Message:
Dear Jim,

The changes necessary to improve the present legal system are very pervasive. There are many bad laws which put harmless people behind bars who should not be, and many loopholes which allow some real bad guys to remain free.

The burden on the jails puts a burden on the courts puts a burden on the lawyers puts a burden on the general public.

Major offenders (armed and dangerous) should not be handled with kid gloves. More stiff punishments for blatantly obvious criminals. Younger first offenders (armed) should also be dealt with more strictly, with tighter followup.

Those found guilty of any crime who have been stonewalling and lying about their innocence all along should be dealt a much harsher punishment for dragging the system along for their lying attempt to avoid their due. Pleading guilty if the shoe fits should also carry a stiff price, but it should be. let's say, double if they are caught in a lie trying to get out of it.

Just as adultery, theft and murder made the jump from the Ten Commandments to the civil/criminal statutes, so should lying just to avoid the law. This should be beyond perjury, a law that punishes people for bearing false witness from the getgo. That would mean a finer filter pre-trial, and I am sure many cases would never get before a judge if some of this was in place.

Not being a lawyer, I may have used some incorrect terminologies.
Please let's not get stuck on those and stay with the program.
So Jim, here are a few of my ideas. I know that it would take a very long time to implement even the smallest of changes, but all we have is time.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 16:52:36 (EDT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: So?
Message:
GI,

Whether or not I agree with any of your proposals, I see nothing in them that addressing the role od a defense lawyer. What's wrong? Did you forget what we were talking about?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 19:41:21 (EDT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: A longer reply
Message:
The changes necessary to improve the present legal system are very pervasive. There are many bad laws which put harmless people behind bars who should not be, and many loopholes which allow some real bad guys to remain free.

Really?? I'll have to file this under 'breaking news' or maybe 'startling insights'.

The burden on the jails puts a burden on the courts puts a burden on the lawyers puts a burden on the general public.

Same.

Major offenders (armed and dangerous) should not be handled with kid gloves.

Are they? Where, when, how? Tell us all about it, GI.

More stiff punishments for blatantly obvious criminals. Younger first offenders (armed) should also be dealt with more strictly, with tighter followup.

Yes, the 'blatantly obvious' ones are a real problem alright. And the young armed kids.... tell me all you know about that, GI.

Those found guilty of any crime who have been stonewalling and lying about their innocence all along should be dealt a much harsher punishment for dragging the system along for their lying attempt to avoid their due.

So, let me get this straight. Get rid of the presumption of innocence and, by the sound of it, the right to trial as well. Is that your plan?

Tell me, GI, do you have any idea where perjury currently fits into
the scheme of things? Like when can an accused get penalized for lying at trial? And, if he's not subject to a separate perjury charge, what effect do you think there is on an accused who is found guilty as opposed to pleading guilty? What do you know abut these things?

Pleading guilty if the shoe fits should also carry a stiff price, but it should be. let's say, double if they are caught in a lie trying to get out of it.

Yes, well we've really got that point, GI. So tell me what someone should do who's innocent but facing a strong circumstantial case nonetheless? Should he plead guilty even if he's not? See, according to you, he's going to be found not only guilty but a liar as well and thus in real hot water. What would you suggest?

Just as adultery, theft and murder made the jump from the Ten Commandments to the civil/criminal statutes, so should lying just to avoid the law. This should be beyond perjury, a law that punishes people for bearing false witness from the getgo. That would mean a finer filter pre-trial, and I am sure many cases would never get before a judge if some of this was in place.

Who's going to determie if people are lying and how? Have you thought of these questions? What are your answersr?

Not being a lawyer, I may have used some incorrect terminologies.
Please let's not get stuck on those and stay with the program.
So Jim, here are a few of my ideas. I know that it would take a very long time to implement even the smallest of changes, but all we have is time.


Well, again, I have to ask you how any of this even touches on the depraved work I do. Care to tie up a few loose ends for me? Second, all I hear in your ideas is the sound of someone who really knows nothing about the subject matter. You have no sense of the history of jurisprudence and none of the contrasting interests the system tries to balance. That's okay. you're not in the system so how should you know it all that well? You shouldn't. The trouble is your pomposity.

Most importantly, though, you have said nothing to support your attack on me. Do you realize that?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 08:01:50 (EDT)
From: GI
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: A longer reply
Message:
Dear Jim,

I said 'Those found guilty of any crime who have been stonewalling and lying about their innocence all along should be dealt a much harsher punishment for dragging the system along for their
lying attempt to avoid their due.'

Then you said, 'So, let me get this straight. Get rid of the presumption of innocence and, by the sound of it, the right to trial as well. Is that your plan?'

No. I am saying that if someone ends up in court who is pleading innocent and who is found to be guilty (and really is), then there should be a penalty beyond perjury or fraud. That person is truly in contempt of the court and the whole system, to come in lying through their teeth to avoid the fruits of their actions.
Innocent until proven guilty is something I would not touch.

As for someone caught in circumstantial evidence, that's your job to unravel.

When I brought up the matter of your profession, I was primarily focussing on the fact that you, of all people, who seem to really love the truth (as you see it), can function in a system where fairness does not always come through. If it all boils down to who's got the sharpest lawyer, then what has happened to justice and truth? Are you saying a fairer system can't happen? That people are just too primitive en masse to obey the ancient laws of human conduct?

It seems contradictory to your nature (as you reveal yourself here) to stand by and watch injustice be served right along with justice in the work you do. You seem to be more of a crusader, fighting exclusively for the underdog, the oppressed, the downtrodden in situations in which you are sure you are protecting someone who deserves your protection.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 11:59:11 (EDT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: Okay, that's that
Message:
When I brought up the matter of your profession, I was primarily focussing on the fact that you, of all people, who seem to really love the truth (as you see it), can function in a system where fairness does not always come through. If it all boils down to who's got the sharpest lawyer, then what has happened to justice and truth? Are you saying a fairer system can't happen? That people are just too primitive en masse to obey the ancient laws of human conduct?

GI,

As we discuss this further, your complaint waters down, waters down, waters down. Had you started this way, just wondering aloud if there were some ways to make the justice system fairer, we might have had an interesting, albeit irrelevant, discussion. (I say that because my ethics are relaly not the question here. I never said 'surrender the reigns of your life to me ....' It ain't me fella!). Unfortunately, you came off a little high-minded and insulting for tastes and, apparently, everyone else's here (with the exception of Cat who is never to be taken seriously, of course.)

I don't know what 'the ancient laws of human conduct' are but I suspect this is just more GI hot air. When will you learn, dude? When will you learn?

Anyway, the short answer to your long-winded ruminations is this: the system's imperfect as human nature's imperfect. No, I can't think of any major overhaul that would improve it. Most importantly, neither can you. Your few suggestions are either inconcrete or laughably unrealistic. Sory, but that's the simple truth of the matter. I think you've really got nothing of import to say on the subject but just wanted to take a jab at me. There! You've had your fun. Satisfied?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Thurs, May 27, 1999 at 20:38:07 (EDT)
From: GI
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: Okay, that's that
Message:
Dear Jim,

I have more important things to do than to take jabs at you.
Nothing is watered down except maybe your scotch...time for a refresher, eh? You are so glib with telling others how they should have done something. You must have aspirations of a judgeship, right? Not yet and not mine.

I did not enter this conversation to discuss improving the legal system, for the 100th time. I got into this conversation because of your place in it and how you feel about getting someone you think is guilty off the hook. You told me. You said you'd feel proud, and want them to call you again. That's enough for me.

I have to live with the way things are, but I don't have to like them. You seem to be happy as a pig in shit (no more high-minded,
now I'm just one of the guys with you) in your work. Congrats.

You said, 'I don't know what 'the ancient laws of human conduct' are...' As an attorney, you should. No stealing, no murdering, no adultery, no bearing false witness....ring a bell? Thousands of years old. Called the Ten Commandments. Are we there yet, are we there yet, are we there yet? No. Why? Because, for one reason, murderers, thieves and liars can hire a clever attorney and play the game 20th century style. You said so yourself. If they couldn't get away with that sort of shit, the landscape would look alot different. You accept no personal responsibility for your own actions...you simply wrap yourself in the flag of attorneyism and pour another scotch.

Evil florishes where good men do nothing. Are you as good a man as you advertise here? Do you fight for the right just in cyberspace, or do you have the stones to try to change your own personal thing? Am I being too up close and personal? This is nothing compared to the insinuations and insults you have hurled.

If you can't think of any good ideas to change it, why don't you create your own situation where you can do it more your way? Others who profess to love truth and fight for justice have.
Morris Dees is down south USA fighting for civil rights and an end to racial violence. That's just one example of lawyers getting out of the usual setting and and freeing themselves of much of the bullshit that you run-of-the-mill attorneys have to deal with daily.

For all practical purposes, this conversation is probably near an end. But before you write me off, please address the contents of this note. Or don't. I won't lose any sleep over it.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 08:04:02 (EDT)
From: GI
Email: None
To: Mike
Subject: So are you saying
Message:
Dear Mike,

I do not have the time or the inclination to outline my personal ideas for an improved justice system. That was not the discussion. I have noticed in past posts when premies bring up something like this in the middle of another conversation, you yell 'strawman' and 'red herring'. Two way street.

As for referring to Native Americans, just forget it. You are too
wrapped up in your own identity to really understand that all native peoples and most religious groups either have been or are presently being persecuted. It is the persecution that I can relate to with anyone else who has been.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:01:40 (EDT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: Really?
Message:
I do not have the time or the inclination to outline my personal ideas for an improved justice system. That was not the discussion.

How can you say that? You argued that it's unethical being a criminal defense lawyer and I asked you what you'd do to make the work more ethical. Are you mad? Of course that was the discussion.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 22:46:46 (EDT)
From: GI
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: Jims sashays around issue
Message:
Dear Jim,

I asked how YOU can do that job and come here so self-righteous?
Once again,YOU have found an insitiution to hide behind.
YOU might have just come home from work, having just gotten an accused child molestor off (while deep down inside YOU know he's dirty), pour YOURSELF a drink, fire up the ol' puter, and spew YOUR more radical-than-thou attitudes about what to do with people like that. That was my question to YOU. I said I recognized that it (legal system) was flawed and needed work.

YOU are avoidiing my questions and trying to shift attention to the monolith. I asked how YOU'D feel about getting someone off who YOU thought was guilty, and YOU said YOU'D be proud. And if that person YOU got off that YOU thought was guilty was a child molestor......______________________________________________. (please fill in the blank)
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 00:01:59 (EDT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: Sure, Gi, anything you say
Message:
YOU are avoidiing my questions and trying to shift attention to the monolith. I asked how YOU'D feel about getting someone off who YOU thought was guilty, and YOU said YOU'D be proud. And if that person YOU got off that YOU thought was guilty was a child molestor......______________________________________________. (please fill in the blank)

If I got a person off who I thought was a child molester I'd feel a couple of things. One, life I was an effective lawyer. Two, that my client was lucky. Three, that I hope he never gets in trouble again and four, that if he does, he calls me. I'd also feel, I'm pretty sure, that the cops or prosecutors need to tighten up something or other. But that's how it always is. The system is always being -- must always be -- tested in the trenches. If you really were part of the system you'd understand better how it all fits together, all the rights of an accused, all the this's and that's.

Anyway, are you finally satisfied? Good. I should hope so.

Now, how 'bout it. You've pontificated at length -- and at my expense -- for some time now about how flawed the criminal jsutice system is. You must know that the onus is on you at this point to put up or shut up. Or, again, as I asked you before, are you really one of those windbags who are perfectly content uttering vain, meaningless critiques without substance? Come on, GI, show us what you're made of.

Oh yeah, if you think I'm even now skirting your analysis of me, think again. I'm more than willing to take another turn around the park, I just think you owe something yourself here. Well?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 00:38:34 (EDT)
From: Victoria
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: To Jim, (OT)
Message:
Hey Jim,

What is all this crap about defending child molesters? I personally know of at least 5 people who were so accused back in the witch hunt 80's who were completely innocent and were just unfortunate enough to be caught up in an ugly divorce/custody case.

I hope lawyers will continue to defend the accused, whatever the charge.

I can't believe the ridiculous drivel that comes out in response to premie arguments...I hope lawyers will continue to defend, hahahahahahaha

Love,
Victoria
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 00:39:33 (EDT)
From: Victoria
Email: None
To: Victoria
Subject: To Jim, (OT)
Message:
I mean, 'duh.'
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 00:48:42 (EDT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: Victoria
Subject: To Jim, (OT)
Message:
Yeah, it's really so easy to pontificate like that. I hope GI will come to terms with that if and when he tries to improve 'his' criminal justice system. Like what's he going to do? Fidget with sentencing principles? Increase (or decrease) the admissability of certian kinds of evidence? Force lawyers to sear oaths of self-loathing? What?

P.S. The dustcovers are the best parts of all Dawkins' books anyway. You're not missing anything. :)
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 10:41:29 (EDT)
From: Mike
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: So are you saying
Message:
GI: YES, it was THE discussion. YOU are the one that threw an unknowledgable red-herring into the discussion. Again, you don't know what you are talking about and the proof is in your inability to handle what I said to you concerning lack-of-knowledge about the subject at hand. Instead, you say you 'don't have time' or 'I'm wrapped up in my own identity.' An appropriate response would have been, 'so how can I learn more if history books are of no use?' Instead, you try to come off as a know-it-all concerning persecution. Yeah, right........A legend in your own mind, I'll bet.

By the way, you are quite correct, I AM wrapped up in my own identity....It's who I am, JEEEZZZZ. Who's identity should I be wrapped up in, M's??????? Sorry, I don't believe that is even possible, much less desirable!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 12:50:15 (EDT)
From: Jerry
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: I'd defend him
Message:
When you are shaving or brushing your teeth and you have to look into your own eyes in the mirror and know that any day you could be called upon to defend someone you believe is a child molestor, that's good enough for me.

If I was a lawyer and they called on me to defend Hitler, Caligula, and Milosevic all in the same trial, I'd give them the best defense I could. I would be bound by honor to. But that's something I don't think you can understand, GI. To you, a person is guilty before proven so. You'd fit into a lynch mob real good.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 13:13:02 (EDT)
From: Roger E. Drek
Email: None
To: Jerry
Subject: waiting for Jim's mea culpa
Message:
GastroIntestinal,

You bet I wanna be there for Jim's breakdown and mea culpa. Wouldn't miss it for the world. In fact, I'm in discussions now to have a camera put into place at Jim's home and office so that we can broadcast it live to the world and forever replay it at the House of Drek. Hell, I'll even sell it to Visions International.

What a moment to behold. Jim down on his knees weeping and praying to a picture of Maharaji that been molded to the shape of his ass because it's been in his wallet for so long. Certainly, being a lawyer has robbed Jim of every decent human characteristic that he ever had as he's learned to subvert every once of decency he ever had by defending father rapers and jaywalkers.

Keep up the good work, GI. You've got him on the ropes now. A little more Native American stuff and maybe something about Jim's hatred towards Santa Claus and I think he'll crack.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 14:38:21 (EDT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: Roger E. Drek
Subject: You're confused
Message:
Could you possibly be a premie? They get confused a lot too, that's why I ask.

GI,

You're wrong about what happened here. You asked me questions, I answered. I didn't evade or avoid you. You just thought my answers reveal a moral problem on my part. That's fine, I guess. You can think what you want. But there's no way you can accuse me of avoiding you.

I then asked you a completely fair and relevant question (note that when Shp started asking me his version of your questions, they were completely irrelevant to what he and I had been talking about). I asked you if you thought the system was so depraved how you'd change it. Apparently you have no ideas on the subject.

Come on, GI, I've been honest and frank with you but you've failed to extend me the same courtesy. I'll ask you again, if you think the system's flawed, how would you change it?

And again, only specific suggestions, please.

Otherwise, you sound like someone criticising the medical establishment. Boy that's easy to do, isn't it? Say someone's got some life-threatening disease that requires radical surgery if the person's ever going to live. The surgery's ugly, the results are ugly and far from certain. How easy to call the doctors 'butchers' etc. But isn't the real question whether or not you've got a better solution?

Or Kosovo, let's say. Easy to fault NATO's policy but the question then must be what better strategy you might have to stave off the Serb slaughter of Kosovans.

Here you've got the age-old problem of balancing interests in the criminal justice system. Your apparent naivite in the area seems to complement your self-righteousness. There's nothing rare about that combination in my experience.

So cough up, bud. You have something to suggest or just a lot of hot wind?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 08:12:17 (EDT)
From: GI
Email: None
To: Jerry
Subject: I'd defend him
Message:
Dear Jerry,

'If I was a lawyer and they called on me to defend Hitler, Caligula, and Milosevic all in the same trial, I'd give them the best defense I could. I would be bound by honor to. But that's something I don't think you can understand, GI. To you, a person is guilty before proven so. You'd fit into a lynch mob real good.'

You have a misguided sense of honor if you'd give Hitler, etc the best defense you could. If someone is obviously guilty beyond doubt, then I would not need to play court to assure myself I'm civilized before the sentencing. Your last two sentences are incorrect and desperate.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:02:28 (EDT)
From: Jerry
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: I'd defend him
Message:
If Hitler had survived WW2, should we have just taken him out and shot him? Without a trial? What kind of justice system are you suggesting, CI? How should Hitler have been dealt with had he survived?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:55:39 (EDT)
From: Jethro
Email: None
To: Jerry
Subject: I'd defend him
Message:
'How should Hitler have been dealt with had he survived?'

In the same way Eichman was.

I can't remember if he(Eichman) had an Israeli lawyer as his defense, but I know Demajuke (Sp?) did and was 'proved' not guilty.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 12:49:01 (EDT)
From: Mike
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: So who died and left you Judge
Message:
Your quote, '.... If someone is obviously guilty beyond doubt.' Obvious according to whom, YOU????? Using your definition, then summary executions by cop are ok, as long as they have the 'smoking gun???????' Incredible....just incredible!

Your general lack of reality-grasp and knowledge are unparalled, GI..... Someone here called you a misguided idealist; that's not what I'd call you!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 15:01:35 (EDT)
From: Judge Drek
Email: None
To: Mike
Subject: Solomon died GI is de Judge
Message:
Simply and obviously, GI does have the wisdom of Solomon and that is why GI is the judge of all.

Man, fairy tales are some much easier than reality. Let GI live in his fairy tale world.

Dang, I wish I had all the answers and the wisdom to boot!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 18:00:11 (EDT)
From: Mickey the Pharisee
Email: None
To: Judge Drek
Subject: Is GI really SHP?
Message:
Geez, he likes to use parables, and he accepts the idea that Solomon was a wise judge just like any other Biblical Literalist without doing any text criticism, and he finds it necessary to respond to every post...who are you, really?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 23:21:51 (EDT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: Come back here, ya' jerk!
Message:
I have lost nothing but the time I have wasted dealing with you.

Hey fella,

You owe me a litle further chat. I answered your questions and you proceeded to drop the black spot on me. That's okay if you stick around and defend your opinion but here you lied about me not answering you, cursed my 'soul' (luckily I don't have one -- don't worry, you don't either) and left before the hard part. Come on, dude, ante up. It's your jsutice system. What precisely would you do to make it better?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 23:31:24 (EDT)
From: Gail
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: GI JOE will be back--he's got
Message:
a shooting to go to (shooting of his doubts at the local video).
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 08:00:05 (EDT)
From: Zac
Email: None
To: Gail
Subject: Crazy thread
Message:
First of all most people do not know what they are getting into when they choose to enter a profession,by the time they do it's too late and most if not all choices involve a degree of dishonorable actions or association with such. Change is possible but it occurs by increments and unless it involves legislation it generally comes from within the organization or group. And guess what folks that is what is happening here with MJ's cult.

I can't think of an ex or premie I know that doesn't want fairness and a better world. But it doesn't happen by burying your head under the blanket unless that's what you need to function I guess.

Openness, feedback, communication, accurate accounting, are all part of a corrected organization and these things are missing in Maharji's cult. That's why it is a cult. It can't be fixed until all the bullshit is on the table and everyone knows what is what.
Then those that want can have a meditation teacher and 4 techniques to practice. Simple.

Unless of course he is the one messiah come to save the world. Then all bets are off. Cause the one messiah talks in riddles, makes his own rules and generally does whatever he pleases. If that is the case I'll watch from afar like catweasel does because it's just to damn dangerous.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 07:44:05 (EDT)
From: GI
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: Jim's ethics (way OT, sorry)
Message:
Jim and the rest of this thread,

You are all in your own world, just like the premies are.
There is no meeting ground until Maharaji addresses you directly about the objections you have to your satisfaction, or at least sends someone with his own answers that connect with you. Until that time, there will be strife with every premie that comes along here. The subject under discussion at any given time won't matter. Premies are guilty here until proven innocent (i.e. until they want out and you to save them).

The law is your chosen profession, not mine. Come up with your own ideas of fixing it. Have you come up with any? Has it even occurred to you to try? How much time have you spent trying to make your own profession fairer? After all, you are an Officer of the Court.

As for me, there won't be consistent justice for all until there are judges like Solomon sitting, with wisdom...not merely politically appointed or elected. Some may have a little wisdom now, but not enough and not consistent. Do you have wisdom, Jim? Or just the appearance of it?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 09:55:16 (EDT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: Figures
Message:
Man,

That's about the stupidest set of ideas I've read in a long time.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 11:21:42 (EDT)
From: Copta' Buzz
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: Figures
Message:
Can you believe this guy? What a dork! I love it that Shp, Melbourne, GI, et al, jumped onto this silly bandwagon. What fools we suffer here! Such ignorance of the way the world operates. They belong in their stinkin' little meaningless cult. They couldn't survive in the real world.

Just my two cents.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 11:38:00 (EDT)
From: Batman
Email: None
To: Copta' Buzz
Subject: The Justice League
Message:
No, rather than Solomon we need the Super Hero Justice League to administer justice.

Jesus, GI, what the hell are you smoking?

You are so full of total bullshit! The wisdom of Solomon. Come on, man, start living in the real world not some world you've construed from comic books and myths.

How can we have these conversations with you when you're so unreal?
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 12:55:13 (EDT)
From: Mike
Email: None
To: GI
Subject: Solo...who??????
Message:
GI: You mean until some mythical character comes to save the day??? Why not Zeus or Hercules.....no, I've got it....Xena, Warrior Princess!
Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Tues, May 25, 1999 at 16:12:10 (EDT)
From: Roger E. Drek
Email: None
To: Mike
Subject: fairy tale world
Message:
Mr. GI hopes to live in a fantasy world where judges are not appointed or elected mortals by Solomon clonse. A world where there is the Lord Of The Universe to bring meaning and both inner and outer peace and Santa Claus lives at the North Pole.

It's all nice and pretty, Mom and apple pie and who can argue with that? Except that it is wonderfully delusional view of the world that GI, in his stifled existence via Maharaji, would like to lead us all to and GI would be a High Priest administering with his compassion and wisdom.

GI, it's time to grow up. Smell the coffee. Take off the blinders and see it for what it is and not what you'd like it to be. Some loudmouths visiting the Forum might call it pessimistic, but at least it is more real than your fantasy.
Return to Index -:- Top of Index