Forum V: Archive | ||
Compiled: Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 19:08:00 (GMT) | ||
From: Sep 02, 2000 | To: Sep 09, 2000 | Page: 3 Of: 5 |
Nigel -:- Darshan, smoke and mirrors... -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:25:39 (GMT) |
__ Loaf -:- Darshan, smoke and mirrors... -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 07:28:16 (GMT) |
__ __ Nigel -:- Loaf - you tell it so well, and so few words.. -:- Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 00:07:21 (GMT) |
__ __ DeProGram Anand Ji -:- Darshan, smoke and mirrors... -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 11:09:10 (GMT) |
__ Sir Dave -:- Darshan, smoke and mirrors... -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:54:15 (GMT) |
__ Shroomananda -:- I remember my first Darshan. When I came around -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:41:18 (GMT) |
__ __ Nigel -:- Oh shit, do I have to reply to this...? -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:44:09 (GMT) |
__ __ __ Michael -:- Can you believe this? -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:03:59 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- Yeah, will the room was filled with 'electricity' -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:45:13 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ Nigel -:- Question for Shroomanda.... (PLEASE RESPOND) -:- Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 00:17:53 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- It's not the words, Nigel. It's the feeling behind -:- Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 00:54:38 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Hal -:- It's not the words, Nigel. It's the feeling behind -:- Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 21:03:59 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ Michael -:- Yeah, will the room was filled with 'electricity' -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:15:25 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- Yeah, maybe you're right, Preacher. I'm just a -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:37:16 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Hal -:- I wonder why Michael gets your back up -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 18:08:54 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- He's very dogmatic, Hal. Read some of my first -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 21:06:44 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Hal -:- Surely all anyone knows is what was written in ... -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 21:41:12 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- If you want to go back and read the original posts -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 21:52:22 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Nigel -:- No need for that... -:- Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 02:09:37 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ gerry -:- He's very dogmatic, Hal. Read some of my first -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 21:15:29 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- I don't know, Jerry. But my point to the Preacher -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 21:44:17 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ gerry -:- YOU state it just as dogmatically, -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 21:49:04 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- When did I state it just as dogmatically, gerry? -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 22:00:47 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ gerry -:- You are obviously a pathological liar -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 23:27:16 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Michael -:- Here I go being dogmatic again!!! -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 22:38:12 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Shroomaanda -:- I never said that Jesus taught this Knowledge. -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 23:10:04 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Michael -:- You're right Shroomananda, and I apologise; -:- Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 00:04:06 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- So is it a fact or simply your belief that Christ -:- Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 01:11:09 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Michael -:- Read the text again. -:- Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 01:21:29 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- Okay, you had your chance, Preacher. I see -:- Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 01:30:51 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Michael -:- How can you call me a proselytizer? -:- Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 03:37:50 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- What about the streets of Gold in heaven, Preach? -:- Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 06:08:03 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Michael -:- What about the streets of Gold in heaven, Preach? -:- Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:09:48 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Hal -:- Could possibly be a metaphor ? nt -:- Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 06:51:09 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Michael -:- You have eyes but can not see. nt -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 23:23:43 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Marianne -:- No, you are ignorant -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:42:05 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ X -:- No -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 10:13:24 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ JohnT -:- X = misogynist creep -:- Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 16:18:10 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Jim -:- Bullshit, X -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 14:47:22 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ GErry -:- Thanks Jim -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 15:08:08 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Lotus Eater -:- I'm not planning to tickle him to death -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 21:41:26 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Michael -:- My dear Lotus Eater, -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 22:04:20 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Lotus Eater -:- Thanks Michael -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 22:08:30 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Marianne -:- Thanks guys -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 19:15:06 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Michael -:- I apologise for dissing Pink Floyd -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 13:09:26 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Hal -:- I apologise for dissing Pink Floyd -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 18:28:01 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ bill -:- dissing stink Floyd -:- Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 03:33:43 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Tonette -:- Not ignorant just stupid -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 07:40:03 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ gerry -:- I was wondering the same thing... -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 15:17:05 (GMT) |
Jerry -:- Why is Stonor here? -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 19:47:11 (GMT) |
__ Stonor -:- Isn't this one of those unnacceptable OT person... -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 06:13:16 (GMT) |
__ __ Jerry -:- No -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 11:23:28 (GMT) |
__ Zelda -:- Stonor = new category -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 21:22:08 (GMT) |
__ __ Jerry -:- I'll say -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:47:24 (GMT) |
__ __ Sir Dave -:- Stonor = new category -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:35:47 (GMT) |
__ __ __ Stonor -:- Just re-read your post ... -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:14:24 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ Sir Dave -:- Just re-read your post ... -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:33:49 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- The nature of the 'beast', as I see it. -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:00:58 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ Jim -:- Please look below for a real taste of Stonor -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:53:19 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- And Jim, I thought you were a freedom fighter for -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 06:27:34 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Jim -:- Stonor, I'm fighting for YOUR freedom! -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 15:04:22 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- In denial Jim? (nt) -:- Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 00:43:52 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- And Jim is STILL avoiding the issue!!!! (nt) -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:34:47 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- I apologized for the metaphor, but now you're -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:18:09 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Jim -:- Stonor, you must be a terrible teacher -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 14:56:17 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- How easily you pass judgement on what you know nil -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 15:01:12 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Jim -:- I judge comfortably based on what I see -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 15:10:17 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- I'm so HAPPY you'll never be in my class Jim! -:- Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 00:37:32 (GMT) |
__ __ __ Stonor -:- Stonor still waking up ... -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:45:40 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ Sir Dave -:- Semantics girl, semantics -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:03:53 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- OK, take it easy boy ... -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:17:34 (GMT) |
__ Shroomananda -:- A non-anything! I knew you all would catch on. NT -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 20:15:05 (GMT) |
__ __ Nigel -:- So is three days as long as you could manage.. -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 20:40:25 (GMT) |
__ __ __ Salam -:- So is three days as long as you could manage.. -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:47:12 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ Sir Dave -:- It fits the profile just right -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:23:10 (GMT) |
__ __ G -:- a 'non-anything' -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 20:23:48 (GMT) |
__ __ __ Hal -:- a 'non-anything' -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 21:09:42 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ G -:- a 'non-anything' -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 21:18:18 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ Hal -:- I should have known nt -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 21:19:40 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ G -:- meaning? nt -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 21:35:35 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Hal -:- meaning? nt -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:06:33 (GMT) |
__ __ Jerry -:- Why is she here, Shroom? -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 20:20:40 (GMT) |
__ __ __ Shroomananda -:- I think she's attracted to Maharaji and/or -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:00:45 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ Stonor -:- Let me quote myself from a post to DD, Shroom ... -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:53:25 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- THEN WHY ARE YOU HERE? You don't know do you? -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:07:07 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ Michael -:- THEN WHY ARE YOU HERE? You don't know do you? -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:43:01 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- Yeah, well, you could be nothing more than an -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:50:15 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Michael -:- I think that you are less than honest... -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:10:01 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- What serious questions have you asked me, -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 06:18:57 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Michael -:- I have asked you many questions -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 21:16:39 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- Fine, Preacher, here's some answers. -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 23:00:34 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Michael -:- Fundamentalist translations? -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 23:35:59 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ Rob -:- Looking for an easy mark, shroom? -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:19:56 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Hal -:- Good post Rob....his feet weren't sweaty ..... -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:39:01 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- Shouldn't you 'Know'? Don't you have 'K'? (nt) -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:19:47 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- Just because I have Knowledge doesn't mean that -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:23:14 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Rob -:- You just don't get it do you? -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:27:55 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- Sorry Shroom - no sarcasm emoticon. -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:52:38 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- Oh, I've told my story, Stonor. Why don't you go -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:08:50 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ Sir Dave -:- THEN WHY ARE YOU HERE Mr Mushroom man? -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:16:07 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Jerry -:- I agree with Shroom -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:34:12 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Jenn -:- Weird is relative, Jerry -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:14:41 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ JohnT -:- Weird is relative, Jerry -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:30:40 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- It's all relative (joke) (OT) -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 14:26:52 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Jerry -:- Weird is relative, Jerry -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:10:36 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- And just what is your 'level', Sir Dave? Why -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:20:36 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Sir Dave -:- But you don't enlighten me either -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:29:01 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Shroomananda -:- I'm not trying to enlighten you or anyone else, -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:40:01 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ Simon Satsang -:- I think she's attracted to Maharaji and/or -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:15:36 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ G -:- You're so phony (nt) -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:06:07 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ hal -:- a personal insult? nt -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:13:51 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ G -:- No, I think 'Shroom' is a hoax (nt) -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:15:30 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Hal -:- you criticised me for making a comment about.. -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:22:00 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ G -:- no -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:28:21 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Hal -:- Well I really think that -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:32:22 (GMT) |
__ gerry -:- That is a very good question, Jerry, one which -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 20:04:36 (GMT) |
__ __ who cares -:- premie plant? -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 21:13:59 (GMT) |
__ __ __ SB -:- Really? Have you consider being wrong? -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:03:50 (GMT) |
__ __ __ gerry -:- premie plant? -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 21:57:39 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ G -:- dictate policy? -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:34:02 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ gerry -:- it's really endless with you isn't it, G -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:58:48 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ G -:- divisive -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:02:34 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ gerry -:- divisive -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:24:08 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ Stonor -:- Premie plant???!!!! Come on Gerry, not you too!!? -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:10:52 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ who cares -:- Premie plant???!!!! Come on Gerry, not you too!!? -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:25:52 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ gerry -:- Stonor, read my post to G below, 'assumptions' -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:13:59 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- Stonor, read my post to G below, 'assumptions' -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:23:38 (GMT) |
__ __ __ G -:- assumptions -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 21:34:27 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ gerry -:- assumptions -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:09:12 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ JohnT -:- Trouble and strife -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:14:28 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ G -:- assumptions -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:58:34 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ gerry -:- assumptions -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:19:53 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ Jim -:- Know what I'd like to see? -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:12:38 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ G -:- see it -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:16:36 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ gerry -:- I don't see it -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:31:40 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- Know what I see? -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:12:46 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Jim -:- Know what I see? -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:25:32 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- OK, I'll try again, but I can't speak for G -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:07:51 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Jim -:- You're not even on topic anymore (nt) -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 15:39:30 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- Topic schmopic, you are myopic and don't -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 16:55:42 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ G -:- case in point -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:26:28 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ gerry -:- would you care to address the issues... -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:31:52 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Hal -:- You do come over as rather pompous.. -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:30:05 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ gerry -:- assumptions a ps to last post. -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:18:47 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ another -:- assumptions a ps to last post. -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:43:27 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- What???? -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:27:40 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ G -:- assumption? -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:20:42 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- Thanks Gerry (nt) -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:25:49 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ G -:- I could use a beer (nt) -:- Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:59:20 (GMT) |
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Stonor -:- I had a nap instead, -:- Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:43:02 (GMT) |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:25:39 (GMT) From: Nigel Email: fitzroy@liverpool.ac.uk To: Everyone Subject: Darshan, smoke and mirrors... Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 07:28:16 (GMT) From: Loaf Email: None To: Nigel Subject: Darshan, smoke and mirrors... Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 00:07:21 (GMT) From: Nigel Email: None To: Loaf Subject: Loaf - you tell it so well, and so few words.. Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 11:09:10 (GMT) From: DeProGram Anand Ji Email: not given To: Loaf Subject: Darshan, smoke and mirrors... Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:54:15 (GMT) From: Sir Dave Email: None To: Nigel Subject: Darshan, smoke and mirrors... Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:41:18 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Nigel Subject: I remember my first Darshan. When I came around Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:44:09 (GMT) From: Nigel Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: Oh shit, do I have to reply to this...? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:03:59 (GMT) From: Michael Email: None To: Nigel Subject: Can you believe this? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:45:13 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Michael Subject: Yeah, will the room was filled with 'electricity' Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 00:17:53 (GMT) From: Nigel Email: fitzroy@liverpool.ac.uk To: Shroomananda Subject: Question for Shroomanda.... (PLEASE RESPOND) Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 00:54:38 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Nigel Subject: It's not the words, Nigel. It's the feeling behind Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 21:03:59 (GMT) From: Hal Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: It's not the words, Nigel. It's the feeling behind Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:15:25 (GMT) From: Michael Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: Yeah, will the room was filled with 'electricity' Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:37:16 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Michael Subject: Yeah, maybe you're right, Preacher. I'm just a Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 18:08:54 (GMT) From: Hal Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: I wonder why Michael gets your back up Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 21:06:44 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Hal Subject: He's very dogmatic, Hal. Read some of my first Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 21:41:12 (GMT) From: Hal Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: Surely all anyone knows is what was written in ... Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 21:52:22 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Hal Subject: If you want to go back and read the original posts Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 02:09:37 (GMT) From: Nigel Email: fitzroy@liverpool.ac.uk To: Shroomananda Subject: No need for that... Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 21:15:29 (GMT) From: gerry Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: He's very dogmatic, Hal. Read some of my first Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 21:44:17 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: gerry Subject: I don't know, Jerry. But my point to the Preacher Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 21:49:04 (GMT) From: gerry Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: YOU state it just as dogmatically, Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 22:00:47 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: gerry Subject: When did I state it just as dogmatically, gerry? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 23:27:16 (GMT) From: gerry Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: You are obviously a pathological liar Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 22:38:12 (GMT) From: Michael Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: Here I go being dogmatic again!!! Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 23:10:04 (GMT) From: Shroomaanda Email: None To: Michael Subject: I never said that Jesus taught this Knowledge. Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 00:04:06 (GMT) From: Michael Email: None To: Shroomaanda Subject: You're right Shroomananda, and I apologise; Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 01:11:09 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Michael Subject: So is it a fact or simply your belief that Christ Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 01:21:29 (GMT) From: Michael Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: Read the text again. Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 01:30:51 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Michael Subject: Okay, you had your chance, Preacher. I see Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 03:37:50 (GMT) From: Michael Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: How can you call me a proselytizer? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 06:08:03 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Michael Subject: What about the streets of Gold in heaven, Preach? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:09:48 (GMT) From: Michael Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: What about the streets of Gold in heaven, Preach? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 06:51:09 (GMT) From: Hal Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: Could possibly be a metaphor ? nt Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 23:23:43 (GMT) From: Michael Email: None To: Shroomaanda Subject: You have eyes but can not see. nt Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:42:05 (GMT) From: Marianne Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: No, you are ignorant Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 10:13:24 (GMT) From: X Email: None To: Marianne Subject: No Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 16:18:10 (GMT) From: JohnT Email: None To: X Subject: X = misogynist creep Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 14:47:22 (GMT) From: Jim Email: None To: X Subject: Bullshit, X Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 15:08:08 (GMT) From: GErry Email: None To: Jim Subject: Thanks Jim Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 21:41:26 (GMT) From: Lotus Eater Email: None To: GErry Subject: I'm not planning to tickle him to death Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 22:04:20 (GMT) From: Michael Email: mgdbach@hotmail.com To: Lotus Eater Subject: My dear Lotus Eater, Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 22:08:30 (GMT) From: Lotus Eater Email: None To: Michael Subject: Thanks Michael Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 19:15:06 (GMT) From: Marianne Email: None To: GErry and Jim Subject: Thanks guys Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 13:09:26 (GMT) From: Michael Email: None To: X Subject: I apologise for dissing Pink Floyd Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 18:28:01 (GMT) From: Hal Email: None To: Michael Subject: I apologise for dissing Pink Floyd Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 03:33:43 (GMT) From: bill Email: None To: Hal Subject: dissing stink Floyd Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 07:40:03 (GMT) From: Tonette Email: None To: Marianne Subject: Not ignorant just stupid Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 15:17:05 (GMT) From: gerry Email: None To: Tonette Subject: I was wondering the same thing... Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 19:47:11 (GMT) From: Jerry Email: None To: Everyone Subject: Why is Stonor here? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 06:13:16 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Jerry Subject: Isn't this one of those unnacceptable OT person... Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 11:23:28 (GMT) From: Jerry Email: None To: Stonor Subject: No Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 21:22:08 (GMT) From: Zelda Email: None To: Jerry Subject: Stonor = new category Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:47:24 (GMT) From: Jerry Email: None To: Zelda Subject: I'll say Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:35:47 (GMT) From: Sir Dave Email: sirdavid12@hotmail.com To: Zelda Subject: Stonor = new category Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:14:24 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Sir Dave Subject: Just re-read your post ... Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:33:49 (GMT) From: Sir Dave Email: None To: Stonor Subject: Just re-read your post ... Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:00:58 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Sir Dave Subject: The nature of the 'beast', as I see it. Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:53:19 (GMT) From: Jim Email: None To: Stonor Subject: Please look below for a real taste of Stonor Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 06:27:34 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Jim Subject: And Jim, I thought you were a freedom fighter for Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 15:04:22 (GMT) From: Jim Email: None To: Stonor Subject: Stonor, I'm fighting for YOUR freedom! Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 00:43:52 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Jim Subject: In denial Jim? (nt) Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:34:47 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Jim Subject: And Jim is STILL avoiding the issue!!!! (nt) Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:18:09 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Jim Subject: I apologized for the metaphor, but now you're Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 14:56:17 (GMT) From: Jim Email: None To: Stonor Subject: Stonor, you must be a terrible teacher Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 15:01:12 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Jim Subject: How easily you pass judgement on what you know nil Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 15:10:17 (GMT) From: Jim Email: None To: Stonor Subject: I judge comfortably based on what I see Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 00:37:32 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Jim Subject: I'm so HAPPY you'll never be in my class Jim! Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:45:40 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Sir Dave Subject: Stonor still waking up ... Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:03:53 (GMT) From: Sir Dave Email: None To: Stonor Subject: Semantics girl, semantics Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:17:34 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Sir Dave Subject: OK, take it easy boy ... Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 20:15:05 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Jerry Subject: A non-anything! I knew you all would catch on. NT Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 20:40:25 (GMT) From: Nigel Email: fitzroy@liverpool.ac.uk To: Shroomananda Subject: So is three days as long as you could manage.. Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:47:12 (GMT) From: Salam Email: None To: Nigel Subject: So is three days as long as you could manage.. Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:23:10 (GMT) From: Sir Dave Email: None To: Salam Subject: It fits the profile just right Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 20:23:48 (GMT) From: G Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: a 'non-anything' Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 21:09:42 (GMT) From: Hal Email: None To: G Subject: a 'non-anything' Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 21:18:18 (GMT) From: G Email: None To: Hal Subject: a 'non-anything' Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 21:19:40 (GMT) From: Hal Email: None To: G Subject: I should have known nt Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 21:35:35 (GMT) From: G Email: None To: Hal Subject: meaning? nt Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:06:33 (GMT) From: Hal Email: None To: G Subject: meaning? nt Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 20:20:40 (GMT) From: Jerry Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: Why is she here, Shroom? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:00:45 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Jerry Subject: I think she's attracted to Maharaji and/or Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:53:25 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: Let me quote myself from a post to DD, Shroom ... Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:07:07 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Stonor Subject: THEN WHY ARE YOU HERE? You don't know do you? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:43:01 (GMT) From: Michael Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: THEN WHY ARE YOU HERE? You don't know do you? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:50:15 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Michael Subject: Yeah, well, you could be nothing more than an Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:10:01 (GMT) From: Michael Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: I think that you are less than honest... Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 06:18:57 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Michael Subject: What serious questions have you asked me, Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 21:16:39 (GMT) From: Michael Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: I have asked you many questions Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 23:00:34 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Michael Subject: Fine, Preacher, here's some answers. Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 23:35:59 (GMT) From: Michael Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: Fundamentalist translations? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:19:56 (GMT) From: Rob Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: Looking for an easy mark, shroom? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:39:01 (GMT) From: Hal Email: None To: Rob Subject: Good post Rob....his feet weren't sweaty ..... Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:19:47 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: Shouldn't you 'Know'? Don't you have 'K'? (nt) Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:23:14 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Stonor Subject: Just because I have Knowledge doesn't mean that Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:27:55 (GMT) From: Rob Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: You just don't get it do you? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:52:38 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: Sorry Shroom - no sarcasm emoticon. Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:08:50 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Stonor Subject: Oh, I've told my story, Stonor. Why don't you go Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:16:07 (GMT) From: Sir Dave Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: THEN WHY ARE YOU HERE Mr Mushroom man? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:34:12 (GMT) From: Jerry Email: None To: Sir Dave Subject: I agree with Shroom Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:14:41 (GMT) From: Jenn Email: None To: Jerry Subject: Weird is relative, Jerry Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:30:40 (GMT) From: JohnT Email: None To: Jenn Subject: Weird is relative, Jerry Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 14:26:52 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: All Subject: It's all relative (joke) (OT) Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:10:36 (GMT) From: Jerry Email: None To: Jenn Subject: Weird is relative, Jerry Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:20:36 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Sir Dave Subject: And just what is your 'level', Sir Dave? Why Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:29:01 (GMT) From: Sir Dave Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: But you don't enlighten me either Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:40:01 (GMT) From: Shroomananda Email: None To: Sir Dave Subject: I'm not trying to enlighten you or anyone else, Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:15:36 (GMT) From: Simon Satsang Email: foaming@themouth.con To: Shroomananda Subject: I think she's attracted to Maharaji and/or Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:06:07 (GMT) From: G Email: None To: Shroomananda Subject: You're so phony (nt) Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:13:51 (GMT) From: hal Email: None To: G Subject: a personal insult? nt Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:15:30 (GMT) From: G Email: None To: hal Subject: No, I think 'Shroom' is a hoax (nt) Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:22:00 (GMT) From: Hal Email: None To: G Subject: you criticised me for making a comment about.. Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:28:21 (GMT) From: G Email: None To: Hal Subject: no Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:32:22 (GMT) From: Hal Email: None To: G Subject: Well I really think that Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 20:04:36 (GMT) From: gerry Email: None To: Jerry Subject: That is a very good question, Jerry, one which Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 21:13:59 (GMT) From: who cares Email: None To: gerry Subject: premie plant? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:03:50 (GMT) From: SB Email: None To: who cares Subject: Really? Have you consider being wrong? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 21:57:39 (GMT) From: gerry Email: None To: who cares Subject: premie plant? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:34:02 (GMT) From: G Email: None To: gerry Subject: dictate policy? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:58:48 (GMT) From: gerry Email: None To: G Subject: it's really endless with you isn't it, G Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:02:34 (GMT) From: G Email: None To: gerry Subject: divisive Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:24:08 (GMT) From: gerry Email: None To: G Subject: divisive Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:10:52 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Gerry Subject: Premie plant???!!!! Come on Gerry, not you too!!? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:25:52 (GMT) From: who cares Email: None To: Stonor Subject: Premie plant???!!!! Come on Gerry, not you too!!? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:13:59 (GMT) From: gerry Email: None To: Stonor Subject: Stonor, read my post to G below, 'assumptions' Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:23:38 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: gerry Subject: Stonor, read my post to G below, 'assumptions' Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 21:34:27 (GMT) From: G Email: None To: gerry Subject: assumptions Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:09:12 (GMT) From: gerry Email: None To: G Subject: assumptions Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:14:28 (GMT) From: JohnT Email: None To: gerry Subject: Trouble and strife Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:58:34 (GMT) From: G Email: None To: gerry Subject: assumptions Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:19:53 (GMT) From: gerry Email: None To: G Subject: assumptions Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:12:38 (GMT) From: Jim Email: None To: G Subject: Know what I'd like to see? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:16:36 (GMT) From: G Email: None To: Jim Subject: see it Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:31:40 (GMT) From: gerry Email: None To: G Subject: I don't see it Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:12:46 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Jim Subject: Know what I see? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:25:32 (GMT) From: Jim Email: None To: Stonor Subject: Know what I see? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:07:51 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Jim Subject: OK, I'll try again, but I can't speak for G Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 15:39:30 (GMT) From: Jim Email: None To: Stonor Subject: You're not even on topic anymore (nt) Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 16:55:42 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: Jim Subject: Topic schmopic, you are myopic and don't Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:26:28 (GMT) From: G Email: None To: Jim Subject: case in point Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:31:52 (GMT) From: gerry Email: None To: G Subject: would you care to address the issues... Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 23:30:05 (GMT) From: Hal Email: None To: G Subject: You do come over as rather pompous.. Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:18:47 (GMT) From: gerry Email: None To: G stonor, all Subject: assumptions a ps to last post. Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:43:27 (GMT) From: another Email: None To: gerry Subject: assumptions a ps to last post. Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:27:40 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: another Subject: What???? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:20:42 (GMT) From: G Email: None To: another Subject: assumption? Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:25:49 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: gerry Subject: Thanks Gerry (nt) Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 22:59:20 (GMT) From: G Email: None To: Stonor Subject: I could use a beer (nt) Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |
Date: Tues, Sep 05, 2000 at 00:43:02 (GMT) From: Stonor Email: None To: G and Gerry Subject: I had a nap instead, Message: | |
| |
Return to Index -:- Top of Index |